Real-world changes in fatigue in severe asthma patients after starting anti-interleukin-4/13 biologic

ten Have,L.,Fieten,K. B.,Meulmeester,F. L.,Hashimoto,S.,Kroes,J. A.,Sont,J. K.,Ten Brinke,A.,De Jong,K.,Rapsodi,T.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4812
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Background: Fatigue is highly prevalent in patients with severe asthma and contributes to the disease burden. Dupilumab improves clinical outcomes in severe eosinophilic asthma, but its real-world effect on fatigue is unknown. Aim: To explore changes in fatigue during 12 months after dupilumab initiation in switchers and biologic-naïve patients. Method: Changes in fatigue (CIS-F) and asthma control (ACQ6) were analyzed over 12 months in adult patients who initiated dupilumab and were included in the Dutch severe asthma registry (RAPSODI). Results: Patients (N=243; 44% naïve) had a mean CIS-F score of 38 (12) at baseline, with 63% having severe fatigue (≥36). As compared to baseline, mean decrease on dupilumab was -3.3 (95%CI -4.6 ; -1.9) for fatigue and –0.45 (–0.57 ; –0.34) for ACQ6. Biologic-naïve patients had higher baseline fatigue scores, and larger decreases in fatigue on dupilumab (mean -4.7 (–7.0 ; -2.5)) as compared to switchers (mean -2.5 (–4.13 ; –0.94)) (Fig 1). A similar pattern was shown for ACQ6, with a –0.85 (–1.04 ; –0.66) decrease in naïve patients. After 12 months, 50% of patients still had severe fatigue. Conclusion: Dupilumab treatment is associated with reduced fatigue, with largest effects in biologic-naïve patients. However, clinical significance remains uncertain. Since 50% of patients still had severe fatigue despite biologic treatment, additional interventions should be considered.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?