Inpatient cost comparison of total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with medial compartmental osteoarthritis using time‐driven activity‐based costing

Perry L. Lim,Marcos R. Gonzalez,Graham S. Goh,Christopher M. Melnic,Hany S. Bedair
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12543
2024-11-18
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Abstract:Purpose Using time‐driven activity‐based costing (TDABC), we sought to compare the total facility costs, comprising supply and personnel costs during the episode of care for the index procedure, in patients with isolated medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 100 UKAs and 100 TKAs from 2019 to 2022. From a larger sample of 4899 TKAs and 137 UKAs, patients with isolated medial OA (Kellgren–Lawrence Grade <2 in other compartments) were radiographically identified. Demographic data included age, sex and body mass index, with comorbidities controlled using the Charlson comorbidity index. Facility costs were calculated using TDABC and standardized in cost units (CUs), a metric for comparing costs across procedures. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of TKA versus UKA on facility costs. Results TKA patients had similar operative times (TKA vs. UKA: 1.01×, p = 0.783) and supply costs (1.00×, p = 0.866), where 'x' denotes the relative cost ratio. However, TKA was associated with higher personnel costs (260.0 vs. 222.5 CUs [1.17×], p
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?