Simulation of Spatiotemporal Trends of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Yangtze River Delta of Eastern China by an Artificial Neural Network

Xiaofei Qin,Shengqian Zhou,Hao Li,Guochen Wang,Xiaohao Wang,Qingyan Fu,Yusen Duan,Yanfen Lin,Juntao Huo,Kan Huang,Congrui Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01025
2022-02-02
Abstract:The implementation of air pollution control measures can alleviate atmospheric mercury pollution, and this mitigation may be affected by changes in meteorological conditions. How to disentangle the effects of emission control and meteorology on atmospheric mercury in the past and future remains unclear. In this study, the relationship between gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and air pollutants/meteorological parameters in the Yangtze River Delta region of Eastern China has been established by applying an artificial neural network model. Simulation results showed that GEM had significantly decreased by 0.96 ng/m3 from 2015 to 2020, mainly due to stringent air pollutant control measures. As a result, natural release ranked as the most important source of GEM by 2020. Considering China's air quality goals, GEM concentrations would be further decreased by 0.24 ng/m3 in 2030 and 0.51 ng/m3 in 2060, reaching a level similar to the current Northern Hemisphere GEM background concentration. In contrast, GEM is simulated to slightly increase by ∼0.02 ng/m3 because of future meteorological changes. This study found that the co-benefits of air pollutant control measures were most efficient in curbing atmospheric mercury pollution and meteorological changes had a marginal offsetting effect.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01025.ANN structure (Text S1 and Figure S2), input variable selection (Text S2), operation process and principle of GSA and PDP (Text S3), locations of air pollution monitoring stations and GEM observation stations (Figure S1), correlation between the observed and ANN-predicted GEM concentrations in Shanghai (Figure S3), comparison of observed and simulated GEM concentrations at various sites (Figure S4), spatial distribution and monthly variation of GEM concentrations in the YRD in 2020 (Figure S5), comparison of GEM concentrations in cold seasons and warm seasons (Figure S6), annual trends of air pollutants and meteorological parameters from 2015 to 2020 (Figure S7), and relationship between the annual concentration of PM2.5 and CO from 2015 to 2020 (Figure S8) (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?