Abstract:Venoms are evolutionary key adaptations that species employ for defense, predation or competition. However, the processes and forces that drive the evolution of venoms and their toxin components remain in many aspects understudied. In particular, the venoms of many smaller, neglected (mostly invertebrate) organisms are not characterized in detail, especially with modern methods. For the majority of these taxa, even their biology is only vaguely known. Modern evolutionary venomics addresses the question of how venoms evolve by applying a plethora of -omics methods. These recently became so sensitive and enhanced that smaller, neglected organisms are now more easily accessible to comparatively study their venoms. More knowledge about these taxa is essential to better understand venom evolution in general. The methodological core pillars of integrative evolutionary venomics are genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, which are complemented by functional morphology and the field of protein synthesis and activity tests. This manuscript focuses on transcriptomics (or RNASeq) as one toolbox to describe venom evolution in smaller, neglected taxa. It provides a hands-on guide that discusses a generalized RNASeq workflow, which can be adapted, accordingly, to respective projects. For neglected and small taxa, generalized recommendations are difficult to give and conclusions need to be made individually from case to case. In the context of evolutionary venomics, this overview highlights critical points, but also promises of RNASeq analyses. Methodologically, these concern the impact of read processing, possible improvements by perfoming multiple and merged assemblies, and adequate quantification of expressed transcripts. Readers are guided to reappraise their hypotheses on venom evolution in smaller organisms and how robustly these are testable with the current transcriptomics toolbox. The complementary approach that combines particular proteomics but also genomics with transcriptomics is discussed as well. As recently shown, comparative proteomics is, for example, most important in preventing false positive identifications of possible toxin transcripts. Finally, future directions in transcriptomics, such as applying 3rd generation sequencing strategies to overcome difficulties by short read assemblies, are briefly addressed.

From whole bodies to single cells: A guide to transcriptomic approaches for ecology and evolutionary biology

Single Cells Make Big Data: New Challenges and Opportunities in Transcriptomics

Rethinking eco‐evo studies of gene expression for non‐model organisms in the genomic era

Transcriptomics in the RNA-seq era

Single‐cell RNA sequencing technologies and applications: A brief overview

Avian Transcriptomics: Opportunities and Challenges

RNA-seq: from technology to biology

Current best practices in single‐cell RNA‐seq analysis: a tutorial

Single cell RNA‐sequencing: A powerful yet still challenging technology to study cellular heterogeneity

The new technologies of high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis: A Step-by-Step Overview

Cross-species RNA-seq for deciphering host–microbe interactions

RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities

Single-Cell Sequencing Methodologies: From Transcriptome To Multi-Dimensional Measurement

A Survey of Best Practices for RNA-seq Data Analysis

Studying Smaller and Neglected Organisms in Modern Evolutionary Venomics Implementing RNASeq (Transcriptomics)—A Critical Guide

Best practices for the execution, analysis, and data storage of plant single-cell/nucleus transcriptomics

RNA-seq: primary cells, cell lines and heat stress

The conserved landscape of RNA modifications and transcript diversity across mammalian evolution

Time-resolved single-cell RNA-seq using metabolic RNA labelling

Status of single cell RNA-seq for reproductive toxicology in zebrafish and the transcriptomic trade-off