Food Safety Aspects of Breeding Maize to Multi-Resistance against the Major (Fusarium graminearum, F. verticillioides, Aspergillus flavus) and Minor Toxigenic Fungi (Fusarium spp.) as Well as to Toxin Accumulation, Trends, and Solutions—A Review

Akos Mesterhazy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10010040
2024-01-04
Journal of Fungi
Abstract:Maize is the crop which is most commonly exposed to toxigenic fungi that produce many toxins that are harmful to humans and animals alike. Preharvest grain yield loss, preharvest toxin contamination (at harvest), and storage loss are estimated to be between 220 and 265 million metric tons. In the past ten years, the preharvest mycotoxin damage was stable or increased mainly in aflatoxin and fumonisins. The presence of multiple toxins is characteristic. The few breeding programs concentrate on one of the three main toxigenic fungi. About 90% of the experiments except AFB1 rarely test toxin contamination. As disease resistance and resistance to toxin contamination often differ in regard to F. graminearum, F. verticillioides, and A. flavus and their toxins, it is not possible to make a food safety evaluation according to symptom severity alone. The inheritance of the resistance is polygenic, often mixed with epistatic and additive effects, but only a minor part of their phenotypic variation can be explained. All tests are made by a single inoculum (pure isolate or mixture). Genotype ranking differs between isolates and according to aggressiveness level; therefore, the reliability of such resistance data is often problematic. Silk channel inoculation often causes lower ear rot severity than we find in kernel resistance tests. These explain the slow progress and raise skepticism towards resistance breeding. On the other hand, during genetic research, several effective putative resistance genes were identified, and some overlapped with known QTLs. QTLs were identified as securing specific or general resistance to different toxicogenic species. Hybrids were identified with good disease and toxin resistance to the three toxigenic species. Resistance and toxin differences were often tenfold or higher, allowing for the introduction of the resistance and resistance to toxin accumulation tests in the variety testing and the evaluation of the food safety risks of the hybrids within 2–3 years. Beyond this, resistance breeding programs and genetic investigations (QTL-analyses, GWAM tests, etc.) can be improved. All other research may use it with success, where artificial inoculation is necessary. The multi-toxin data reveal more toxins than we can treat now. Their control is not solved. As limits for nonregulated toxins can be introduced, or the existing regulations can be made to be stricter, the research should start. We should mention that a higher resistance to F. verticillioides and A. flavus can be very useful to balance the detrimental effect of hotter and dryer seasons on aflatoxin and fumonisin contamination. This is a new aspect to secure food and feed safety under otherwise damaging climatic conditions. The more resistant hybrids are to the three main agents, the more likely we are to reduce the toxin losses mentioned by about 50% or higher.
microbiology,mycology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are multi - resistance breeding of maize against major and minor toxigenic fungi (such as **Fusarium graminearum**, **F. verticillioides**, **Aspergillus flavus**, etc.), and the problem of toxin accumulation produced by these fungi. Specifically, the author focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Food safety issues**: Maize is one of the crops most severely infected by toxigenic fungi, and the toxins produced by these fungi are harmful to human and animal health. The article points out that the annual maize yield loss and toxin contamination caused by toxigenic fungi are estimated to be between 220 million and 265 million tons. Therefore, improving the resistance of maize to these fungi and reducing toxin accumulation are crucial for ensuring food safety. 2. **Multi - toxin contamination issues**: Recent studies have shown that the co - existence of multiple toxins is very common, which makes food safety assessment more complicated. Most current research and breeding programs focus on a single toxin and ignore the impact of multi - toxin contamination. The article emphasizes the need for more research to solve this problem. 3. **Climate impact**: The increase in temperature and the intensification of drought conditions caused by global warming have increased the contamination risk of certain toxins (such as aflatoxin and fumonisin). The article explores the impact of climate change on maize - toxigenic fungi and proposes the necessity of improving resistance through breeding to meet future climate challenges. 4. **The current situation and challenges of resistance breeding**: Although some effective resistance genes have been identified, most current breeding programs still focus on a single pathogen, and the genetic mechanism of resistance is complex, involving multiple genes and phenotypic effects. In addition, the existing testing methods and evaluation criteria also have limitations, resulting in low reliability of resistance data. 5. **Future prospects**: The article calls for strengthening resistance breeding research, improving testing methods, and taking multi - toxin contamination into consideration. At the same time, it is recommended to further improve the resistance of maize and the level of food safety through the comprehensive application of agricultural management measures and technical means. In summary, this paper aims to propose new ideas and methods to solve the problems of maize multi - resistance breeding and toxin accumulation by reviewing the current research progress, in order to meet the increasingly severe food safety and climate challenges.