Laboratory data and broncho-alveolar lavage on Covid-19 patients with no intensive care unit admission: Correlation with chest CT features and clinical outcomes

Cosimo Nardi,Andrea Magnini,Vieri Rastrelli,Giulia Zantonelli,Linda Calistri,Chiara Lorini,Valentina Luzzi,Leonardo Gori,Luca Ciani,Fabio Morecchiato,Virginia Simonetti,Anna Julie Peired,Nicholas Landini,Edoardo Cavigli,Guang Yang,Julien Guiot,Sara Tomassetti,Stefano Colagrande
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039028
IF: 1.6
2024-07-20
Medicine
Abstract:Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), first detected in China, in December 2019, has been rapidly spreading around the world reaching pandemic proportions in March 2020. [ 1 ] Covid-19 caused more than 7 million deaths in 4 years ( https://covid19.who.int/ ). The detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) on nasopharyngeal swabs is still considered the gold standard technique (sensitivity 95–97% and specificity 99%) for a definitive diagnosis of Covid-19. [ 2 , 3 ] The excellent NAAT detection rate derives from the analysis of pooled nasal and throat swabs. Conversely, reported sensitivities of salivary, nasal, or throat swabs alone are of 85%, 86%, and 68%, respectively, indicating a higher risk of false negative results. [ 3 ] One more issue to be considered is the inadequate sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a positive specimen with a low viral load. Therefore, it is recommended to repeat NAAT 24 to 48 hours later if the clinical suspicion of Covid-19 persists. [ 3 ] NAAT on broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) specimens shows higher positive rate (93%) than nasal and pharyngeal swabs (63% and 32%, respectively). [ 4 ] Therefore, BAL is indicated in cases of uncertain diagnosis, e.g. negative upper respiratory tract samples and high suspicion of Sars-Cov-2 infection, when clinical and safety criteria are met, still considering the risk for both patients and healthcare staff related to the aerosol generated during the procedure. [ 5 ] Moreover, BAL permits the collection of material suitable for microbiological culture to define the presence of co-infection, [ 6 ] but it is not always feasible due to eventual contraindications to bronchoscopy and requires a relatively long time to be processed. [ 7 , 8 ]
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?