Abstract:Abdullah Shbeer Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Abdullah Shbeer, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Al Maarefah Road, P.O. Box 114, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia, Email Introduction: This research seeks to evaluate the occupational radiation dose, quantified as the whole-body Annual Mean Effective Dose (AMED), received by anesthesia personnel in interventional cardiology. Methods: Thermoluminescent dosimetry data was collected over five years (2019– 2023) for a total of 175 anesthesia staff. Technologists comprised approximately 72.4% of the participants (55% male and 45% female), while consultants accounted for 27.6% (70% male and 30% female). Statistical tests, including Independent Samples T -Test and One-Way ANOVA, compared AMED across genders, job titles, and years. Results: The study's findings on AMED across all staff from 2019 to 2023 showed marked variability in AMED. There was a significant rise in AMED from 0.72 mSv in 2019 to 0.92 mSv in 2020, then a decline to 0.82 mSv in 2021, with further decreases to 0.67 mSv in 2022 and finally to 0.65 mSv in 2023 (p < 0.001). The average AMED over the five-year span (2019– 2023) was 0.76 ± 0.4 mSv. In terms of gender, the overall AMED for males was 0.73 ± 0.36 mSv and for females 0.79 ± 0.45 mSv, showing no significant statistical difference (p = 0.272). Significant differences in exposure were observed between the technologists who experienced a higher overall AMED (0.8 ± 0.43 mSv) compared to consultants (0.63 ± 0.29 mSv, p = 0.008). Discussion: Despite these variations, AMED values remained lower than the annual occupational dose limit of 20 mSv, indicating generally low radiation exposure for anesthesia staff. This study emphasizes the importance of ongoing monitoring and enhanced protective measures to safeguard the health of medical professionals working with radiation. Keywords: interventional cardiology, whole-body dose, radiation exposure, occupational safety, medical staff The increasing utilization of interventional cardiology procedures has heralded a new era in medical therapeutics, offering minimally invasive solutions for a range of cardiovascular diseases. However, these procedures often involve the use of ionizing radiation, which can pose significant health risks to both patients and healthcare professionals involved, including anesthesia staff. 1,2 Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation presents numerous health risks, primarily due to its ability to damage cellular and genetic material. 3 This interaction can lead to both acute and long-term health effects, with chronic low-level exposure—common in occupational settings—particularly increasing the risk of cancer, including leukemia, 4,5 and cardiovascular diseases such as Coronary Artery Disease, heart valve damage, cardiomyopathy, peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. The pathophysiology behind these cardiovascular conditions involves a series of interconnected mechanisms: ionizing radiation first causes direct damage to endothelial cells, leading to dysfunction and inflammation, which then promotes atherosclerosis. Concurrently, fibrosis contributes to the stiffening of heart and blood vessels, while oxidative stress exacerbates damage to cardiovascular tissues. 6–8 Beyond cancer and cardiovascular issues, radiation exposure is also associated with skin and blood damage, cataracts, infertility, and birth defects. It's important to note that the probability of these adverse health effects is proportional to the dose received, but no level of radiation exposure is considered completely safe. 5 In interventional cardiology, procedures such as angioplasty, stenting, and electrophysiological interventions have become commonplace. These procedures rely extensively on fluoroscopy, a technique that uses real-time X-ray imaging to guide catheters and other medical devices within the body. 9,10 While the benefits of fluoroscopy in enhancing procedural accuracy and patient outcomes are indisputable, its implications for radiation exposure among healthcare professionals have not been sufficiently explored, particularly concerning anesthesia staff. 1 Anesthesia staff are integral to the interventional cardiology team, providing critical care and pain management. In contrast to radiologists and interventional cardiologists, staff in anesthesia may not consistently receive sufficient training in radiation protection or understand the long-term consequences of radiation exposure. 11–13 This gap in knowledge and practice raises significant concerns about their occupational health and safety. Historically, research on occupational radiation exposure has -Abstract Truncated-

Working in interventional cardiology laboratories: The perceived impact of radiation exposure as a health and gender hazard. A NEXT generation ANMCO initiative

Body Pain - an Unheeded Personal Health Hazard in Interventional Cardiologists: A National Online Cross-Sectional Survey Study in China

What Is Worth Knowing in Interventional Practices about Medical Staff Radiation Exposure Monitoring: A Review of Recent Outcomes of EURADOS Working Group 12

Radiation Awareness and X‐Ray Use in Cardiology: An International Independent Web‐Based Survey

The impact of the radiology career on family planning: A survey of practicing radiologists and trainees

Gender Differences in Radiation Dose From Nuclear Cardiology Studies Across the World: Findings From the INCAPS Registry

EACVI survey on radiation exposure in interventional echocardiography

Past and present work practices of European interventional cardiologists in the context of radiation protection of the eye lens—results of the EURALOC study

Assessment of the Occupational Radiation Exposure of Anesthesia Staff in Interventional Cardiology

Radiation Exposure, Training, and Safety in Cardiology

A report on a survey among Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology associates regarding ionizing radiation protection practices in national interventional cath-labs

Occupational Radiation Exposure During Pregnancy: A Survey of Urologists on Perception, Experience, and Practice Patterns

The interventional radiology gender gap: perspectives from the international IR training survey

On the Placement of Apron Dosemeters and Dose Assessment in Interventional Cardiology Procedures: Preliminary Results.

Impact of discrimination on training and career of radiation oncologists in France

P020 GENDER AND CARDIOLOGY: EVALUATION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND LABOR INEQUALITY IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

Reproductive effects of low-to-moderate medical radiation exposure

A study protocol for the evaluation of occupational mutagenic/carcinogenic risks in subjects exposed to antineoplastic drugs: a multicentric project

Occupational orthopedic problems and its relation to personal radiation protection in interventional radiology

Radiation shielding calculation for interventional radiology: An updated workload survey using a dose monitoring software