Abstract:Abstract Background and aims Pain is a multidimensional experience that is difficult to describe and to assess. To scale current pain, assessment refers to a maximum level of pain, but little is known about this process. Further, clinicians tend to underestimate patients’ pain, with or without patients’ own reports, and to underestimate to a greater extent with more clinical experience, possibly due to recalibration of a personal pain scale with increasing exposure to severe pain. We sought to determine how medical students rated pain in early years of clinical exposure, and in relation to experience of their own and others’ worst pains. Methods An online survey sampled medical students’ rating and description of their own worst pain and of that witnessed in another; also what would cause the maximum level of pain and what behaviours characterised it. Last, they indicated their preference among pain scales. Results Thirty-six medical students provided responses, the majority in their first six months of clinical exposure. Students’ own worst pain was rated a mean of 6.7/10 (s.d. 1.6) on a numerical scale; causes were diverse but with many bone fractures. Mean worst pain observed in another was rated 8.6/10 (s.d. 1.4); causes included fractures, gallstones, and sickle cell crises. Another’s worst pain was significantly higher (mean 9.4, s.d. 0.8 vs mean 8.0 s.d. 1.4) when rated after the student’s own pain than before it (presentation order randomised). We found no effect of clinical exposure on estimation of worst pain in another person, nor was there a personal tendency to rate pain using more or less extreme values. Students expected pain of 10/10 to be presented with many verbal, facial and whole body behaviours, and signs of physiological stress. Collectively, behavioural descriptions were rich and varied, but with many incompatibilities: for instance, between ‘writhing’ and ‘rigidity’ expected in the person with extreme pain. Most students preferred the numerical rating scale over visual analogue and verbal scales. Conclusions The study requires replication, particularly for clinical experience, where we found no significant difference in estimation of another’s pain over the first three years of medical students’ clinical exposure, but the comparison was underpowered. Despite no systematic individual difference in using pain ratings, there was a marked effect of rating another’s worst pain higher when the rater had previously rated his/her own worst pain. This suggests anchoring estimate of another’s pain in personal pain experience, and a possible way to mitigate clinicians’ underestimation of patients’ pain. Medical students’ recognition of the importance of facial expression in indicating another’s pain severity was encouraging, but most students anticipated only a narrow range of behaviours associated with extreme pain, thereby excluding other authentic behaviours. Implications Many clinical guidelines mandate regular pain assessment for hospital inpatients, and encourage routine assessment in community and outpatient settings, in order to decide on and monitor treatment. Replication and elaboration of this study could extend our understanding of how clinicians interpret pain scales completed by patients, and how they estimate patients’ pain.

Stop Interfering! A Reflection on the Intrusive and Elusive Nature of Pain in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Pain Interference in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

A systematic review of the psychosocial factors associated with pain in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Exploring pain adaptation in youth with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Identifying youth and parent resilience resources and mechanisms

Measuring Musculoskeletal Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents

Factors for Consideration by Pediatric Rheumatologists When Scoring the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: First Step Toward an Internal Consensus

Adherence in young people living with juvenile arthritis: A systematic review.

The difference of disease perception by juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients and their parents: analysis of the JAMAR questionnaire

The Relationship of Fatigue, Pain Interference and Physical Disability in Children Newly Diagnosed with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Reprint of "Residual pain in rheumatoid arthritis: Is it a real problem?"

Pain sensitisation and joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

The challenge of pain evaluation in haemophilia: can pain evaluation and quantification be improved by using pain instruments from other clinical situations?

Chronic Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

"Every Little Furrow of Her Brow Makes Me Want To Stop": An Interpretative Phenomenologic Analysis of Mothers' Experiences With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treatments

Pain is Common in Myositis and Associated with Disease Activity

DEFINITIONS AND ASSESSMENTS OF PAIN WITH IMPACT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SCOPING REVIEW

"Inflammatory or non-inflammatory pain in inflammatory arthritis - How to differentiate it?"

How do medical students use and understand pain rating scales?

Pain Assessment and Treatment in Children With Significant Impairment of the Central Nervous System

Quality Indicators for Pain in Adults: A Review of Performance Measures by the American College of Physicians

P103 Centralised pain in early rheumatoid arthritis predicts worse bodily pain outcomes