N2 component implied a subjective conflict detection thinking strategy: an event-related potential study of the covariation detection task

Shangsong Yan,Xinyi Li,Wei Bao,Zhaoxian Li,Xiongwei Xu,Junlong Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06525-0

IF: 2.8

2024-08-27

Current Psychology

Abstract:Previous research on decision-making tasks suggests that material differences between conflict and non-conflict questions induce differences in the N2 component. However, varying thinking strategies of individuals in solving conflict and non-conflict questions may also lead to differences in the N2 component. This study modified the covariable detection task to a decision-making experiment material more suitable for event-related potential (ERP) studies and compared the differences in ERP components between high- and low-accuracy individuals in solving conflict and non-conflict questions. The results showed that high-accuracy individuals had a large amplitude of the N2 (300-400ms) component when solving both kinds of questions, while low-accuracy individuals did not, indicating that high and low-accuracy individuals have different thinking strategies when solving decision-making tasks. High-accuracy individuals completed conflict detection for both conflict and non-conflict questions, whereas low-accuracy individuals made mistakes because they were unaware of the conflicts rather than due to failures in conflict detection. This study provides a new interpretive perspective of the N2 component induced by decision-making tasks, indicating that the N2 component reflects a thinking strategy for conflict detection.

psychology, multidisciplinary