Endoscopic and histological risk stratification for gastric cancer using gastric intestinal metaplasia

Masashi Kawamura,Noriya Uedo,Kenshi Yao,Tomoyuki Koike,Takashi Kanesaka,Waku Hatta,Yohei Ogata,Wataru Iwai,Satoshi Yokosawa,Junya Honda,Sho Asonuma,Hideki Okata,Motoki Ohyauchi,Hirotaka Ito,Yasuhiko Abe,Nobuyuki Ara,Shoichi Kayaba,Hirohiko Shinkai,Takao Kanemitsu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16617
2024-05-15
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Abstract:Background and Aim Intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the gastric mucosa is strongly associated with the risk of gastric cancer (GC). This study was performed to investigate the usefulness of endoscopic and histological risk stratification for GC using IM. Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective study involving 10 Japanese facilities (UMINCTR000027023). The ridge/tubulovillous pattern, light blue crest (LBC), white opaque substance (WOS), endoscopic grading of gastric IM (EGGIM) score using non‐magnifying image‐enhanced endoscopy, and operative link on gastric IM assessment (OLGIM) were evaluated for their associations with GC risk in all patients. Results In total, 380 patients (115 with GC and 265 without GC) were analyzed. The presence of an LBC (limited to antrum: odds ratio [OR] 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.1–5.0], extended to corpus: OR 3.6 [2.1–6.3]), the presence of WOS (limited to antrum: OR 3.0 [1.7–5.3], extended to corpus: OR 4.2 [2.1–8.2]), and histological IM (limited to antrum: OR 3.2 [1.4–7.4], extended to corpus: OR 8.5 [4.5–16.0]) were significantly associated with GC risk. Additionally, the EGGIM score (5–8 points: OR 8.8 [4.4–16.0]) and OLGIM (stage III/IV: OR 12.5 [6.1–25.8]) were useful for stratification of GC risk. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value for GC risk was 0.740 for OLGIM and 0.706 for EGGIM. Conclusions The LBC, WOS, EGGIM, and OLGIM were strongly associated with GC risk in Japanese patients. This finding can be useful for GC risk assessment in daily clinical practice.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?