Abstract:A neuroscience-based approach has recently been proposed for the relation between the mind and the brain. The proposal is that events at the sub-neuronal, neuronal, and neuronal network levels take place simultaneously to perform a computation that can be described at a high level as a mental state, with content about the world. It is argued that as the processes at the different levels of explanation take place at the same time, they are linked by a non-causal supervenient relationship: causality can best be described in brains as operating within but not between levels. This mind-brain theory allows mental events to be different in kind from the mechanistic events that underlie them; but does not lead one to argue that mental events cause brain events, or vice versa: they are different levels of explanation of the operation of the computational system. Here, some implications are developed. It is proposed that causality, at least as it applies to the brain, should satisfy three conditions. First, interventionist tests for causality must be satisfied. Second, the causally related events should be at the same level of explanation. Third, a temporal order condition must be satisfied, with a suitable time scale in the order of 10 ms (to exclude application to quantum physics; and a cause cannot follow an effect). Next, although it may be useful for different purposes to describe causality involving the mind and brain at the mental level, or at the brain level, it is argued that the brain level may sometimes be more accurate, for sometimes causal accounts at the mental level may arise from confabulation by the mentalee, whereas understanding exactly what computations have occurred in the brain that result in a choice or action will provide the correct causal account for why a choice or action was made. Next, it is argued that possible cases of “downward causation” can be accounted for by a within-levels-of-explanation account of causality. This computational neuroscience approach provides an opportunity to proceed beyond Cartesian dualism and physical reductionism in considering the relations between the mind and the brain.

The diversity of possible constitutive components in cognitive neurosciences

Becoming Cognitive Science

Towards a pluralistic neurobiological understanding of consciousness

A unifying perspective on neural manifolds and circuits for cognition

Incorporating individual differences into a mechanistic embodied cognitive neuroscience

Elements of Consciousness and Cognition. Biology, Mathematic, Physics and Panpsychism: an Information Topology Perspective

Neurodiversity and the Social Ecology of Mental Functions

The New Mechanistic Approach and Cognitive Ontology—Or: What Role do (Neural) Mechanisms Play in Cognitive Ontology?

A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework across Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Robotics

Physics and Five Problems in the Philosophy of Mind

A unifying theory of physics and biological information through consciousness

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind-brain interaction

From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind

Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach

Complex-Dynamic Origin of Consciousness and the Critical Choice of Sustainability Transition

Cognitive function: holarchy or holacracy?

Complementarity of mental content and logistic algorithms in a taxonomy of cognitive functions

Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction

Irruption and Absorption: A 'Black-Box' Framework for How Mind and Matter Make a Difference to Each Other

The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework

Categorial compositionality II: universal constructions and a general theory of (quasi-)systematicity in human cognition