Abstract:Land-use change is considered the greatest threat to nature, having caused worldwide declines in the abundance, diversity, and health of species and ecosystems. Despite increasing research on this global change driver, there are still challenges to forming an effective synthesis. The estimated impact of land-use change on biodiversity can depend on location, research methods, and taxonomic focus, with recent global meta-analyses reaching disparate conclusions. Here we critically appraise this research body and our ability to reach a reliable consensus. We employ named entity recognition to analyse more than 4000 abstracts, alongside full reading of 100 randomly selected papers. We highlight the broad range of study designs and methodologies used; the most common being local space-for-time comparisons that classify land use in situ. Species metrics including abundance, distribution, and diversity were measured more frequently than complex responses such as demography, vital rates, and behaviour.We identified taxonomic biases, with vertebrates well represented whilst detritivores were largely missing. Omitting this group may hinder our understanding of how land-use change affects ecosystem feedbacks. Research was heavily biased towards temperate forested biomes in North America and Europe, with warmer regions being acutely underrepresented despite offering potential insights into the future effects of land-use change under novel climates. Various land use histories were covered, although more research in understudied regions including Africa and the Middle East is required to capture regional differences in the form of current and historical land use practices. Failure to address these challenges will impede our global understanding of land-use change impacts on biodiversity, limit the reliability of future projections, and have repercussions for the conservation of threatened species. Beyond identifying literature biases, we highlight the research priorities and data gaps that need urgent attention and offer perspectives on how to move forwards.

Biodiversity impacts of recent land-use change driven by increases in agri-food imports

Impacts of global food supply on biodiversity via land use and climate change

Agricultural trade and its impacts on cropland use and the global loss of species habitat

Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity

Land‐use change and biodiversity: Challenges for assembling evidence on the greatest threat to nature

Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth

A global meta-analysis reveals a consistent reduction of soil fauna abundance and richness as a consequence of land use conversion

Biodiversity consequences of cropland abandonment

Global agricultural trade and land system sustainability: Implications for ecosystem carbon storage, biodiversity, and human nutrition

Anthropogenic climate and land-use change drive short- and long-term biodiversity shifts across taxa

Comparing the impact of future cropland expansion on global biodiversity and carbon storage across models and scenarios

Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity

Land use imperils plant and animal community stability through changes in asynchrony rather than diversity

Land-use-driven biodiversity impacts of diets—a comparison of two assessment methods in a Finnish case study

Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity

Analysis of complex trophic networks reveals the signature of land-use intensification on soil communities in agroecosystems

China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment

Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security

Impacts of urban land-cover on plant community structure and biodiversity in a multi-use landscape

Effects of profit-driven cropland expansion and conservation policies

Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and cultural ecosystem services