0231 Exploring Age Differences in Relationships Between Prior Sleep Duration and Sleep Latency on MSLTs

Lara Keohane,Katie McCullar,Derk-Jan Dijk,Elizabeth Klerman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0231
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction We investigated whether the relationship between daytime sleepiness and previous night’s sleep duration changes with age using a protocol in which individuals were studied both after habitual sleep duration and after multiple days with extended sleep opportunities. Methods 35 younger (18-32 years old, 18 F) and 18 older (60-76 years old, 6 F) healthy participants were studied using polysomnography in an in-lab protocol (Klerman and Dijk, Curr. Biol. 2008). During night 1 (SP1), participants were scheduled to sleep based on their at-home sleep schedules. On day 2, the 5 sessions of a MSLT (MSLT_pre) began 2 hours after SP1 ended .Participants then began a schedule with 16 hrs (12 hrs at night and 4 hrs during day) of sleep opportunity in bed per 24 hrs for 7 days, followed by a second set of MSLTs (MSLT-post). Total sleep time (TST) for the nighttime sleep episodes prior to both sets of MSLTs was calculated. The median sleep latency and percent of the MSLT sessions in which participants fell asleep (PctSlept) within MSLT_pre and MSLT_post were calculated. Results Total sleep time on SP1 ranged from 5.4-9.7hr; only Younger participants had a TST >8.0 hr. Therefore, for analyses comparing Younger and Older participants, only TST of < 8.0 hr was used (21 Younger, 18 Older). All participants fell asleep at least once during MSLT_pre. During MSLT_post, 32% of Younger and 8% of Older participants did not fall asleep during any of the MSLT sessions (i.e., PctSlept=0); therefore, latency-based analyses cannot be done for MSLT_post data. There was a negative correlation between SP1 TST and median sleep latency for MSLT_pre for Younger (Pearson R=0.35; p=0.049) but not Older participants. There was a negative correlation between SP1 TST and PctSlept for Younger (Pearson R=-0.47, p=0.006), but not Older participants. There was no relationship between TST before MSLT_post and the PctSlept for either Younger or Older participants. Repeated measures ANOVA testing (MSLT_pre vs MSLT_post) found a time (p< 0.001) and time*agegroup (p=0.008) effect for PctSlept. Conclusion The relationship between the prior night’s sleep and daytime sleepiness may change with age. Support (if any) NIH R01- HL166205, R01-HD107064
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?