Abstract:The paper-reviewer recommendation task is of significant academic importance for conference chairs and journal editors. It aims to recommend appropriate experts in a discipline to comment on the quality of papers of others in that discipline. How to effectively and accurately recommend reviewers for the submitted papers is a meaningful and still tough task. Generally, the relationship between a paper and a reviewer often depends on the semantic expressions of them. Creating a more expressive representation can make the peer-review process more robust and less arbitrary. So the representations of a paper and a reviewer are very important for the paper-reviewer recommendation. Actually, a reviewer or a paper often belongs to multiple research fields, which increases difficulty in paper-reviewer recommendation. In this article, we propose a Multi-Label Classification method using a HIErarchical and transPArent Representation named Hiepar-MLC . First, we introduce HIErarchical and transPArent Representation (Hiepar) to express the semantic information of the reviewer and the paper. Hiepar is learned from a two-level bidirectional gated recurrent unit based network applying the attention mechanism. It is capable of capturing the two-level hierarchical information (word-sentence-document) and highlighting the elements in reviewers or papers to support the labels. This word-sentence-document information mirrors the hierarchical structure of a reviewer or a paper and captures the exact semantics of them. Then we transform the paper-reviewer recommendation problem into a multi-level classification issue, whose multiple research labels exactly guide the learning process. It is flexible in that we can select any multi-label classification method to solve the paper-reviewer recommendation problem. Further, we propose a simple multi-label-based reviewer assignment (MLBRA) strategy to select the appropriate reviewers. It is interesting in that we also explore the paper-reviewer recommendation in the coarse-grain granularity. Extensive experiments on the real-world dataset consisting of the papers in the ACM Digital Library show that Hiepar-MLC achieves better label prediction performance than the existing representation alternatives. In addition, with the MLBRA strategy, we show the effectiveness and the feasibility of our transformation from paper-reviewer recommendation to multi-label classification.

Automatic Academic Paper Rating Based on Modularized Hierarchical Convolutional Neural Network

Re-examining Lexical and Semantic Attention: Dual-view Graph Convolutions Enhanced BERT for Academic Paper Rating.

Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendation

Attention-based Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Essay Scoring.

Automatic Document Metadata Extraction Based on Deep Networks.

MCAP: Low-Pass GNNs with Matrix Completion for Academic Recommendations

Hierarchical Interdisciplinary Topic Detection Model for Research Proposal Classification

A Multi-Label Classification Method Using a Hierarchical and Transparent Representation for Paper-Reviewer Recommendation

Feature Engineering and Ensemble Modeling for Paper Acceptance Rank Prediction

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis

Automatic Scoring of Students' Science Writing Using Hybrid Neural Network

Bridging Research and Readers: A Multi-Modal Automated Academic Papers Interpretation System

Automatic Large Language Model Evaluation Via Peer Review

Sentiment Analysis of Peer Review Texts for Scholarly Papers

Machine Identification of High Impact Research through Text and Image Analysis

A Unified Review of Deep Learning for Automated Medical Coding

Recommending scientific paper via heterogeneous knowledge embedding based attentive recurrent neural networks

DeepReview: Automatic Code Review Using Deep Multi-instance Learning

paper2repo: GitHub Repository Recommendation for Academic Papers

A Scalable Hybrid Research Paper Recommender System for Microsoft Academic

AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews