Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Extreme event shocks and dynamic volatility interactions: The stock, commodity, and carbon markets in China

Extreme Risk Spillovers Between China and Major International Stock Markets

Volatility Spillover from Carbon Prices to Stock Prices: Evidence from China’s Carbon Emission Trading Markets

Interaction among China carbon emission trading markets: Nonlinear Granger causality and time-varying effect

Dynamic information spillover between Chinese carbon and stock markets under extreme weather shocks

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Global Oil Shocks and China’s Commodity Markets: the Role of OVX

Lead-lag relations between the Chinese carbon and energy markets: Evidence from extreme climate shocks

Extreme Weather, Policy Uncertainty, and Risk Spillovers Between Energy, Financial, and Carbon Markets

Risk Spillovers between China's Carbon and Energy Markets

The Return and Volatility Spillover between Carbon Futures Market and Global Financial, Energy and Commodity Futures Markets

Volatility transmissions across international oil market, commodity futures and stock markets: Empirical evidence from China

The spillover effect between carbon market and stock markets: evidence from China

Extreme Risk Spillovers Between Crude Oil and Stock Markets

Complex causalities between the carbon market and the stock markets for energy intensive industries in China

Dynamic spillover effects and portfolio strategies between crude oil, gold and Chinese stock markets related to new energy vehicle

Volatility Spillover Between the Carbon Market and Traditional Energy Market Using the DGC-t-MSV Model

The contagion of extreme risks between fossil and green energy markets: evidence from China

Dynamic Spillovers Between International Crude Oil Market and China's Commodity Sectors: Evidence From Time-Frequency Perspective of Stochastic Volatility

Asymmetric volatility spillovers among new energy, ESG, green bond and carbon markets

Carbon volatility connectedness and the role of external uncertainties: Evidence from China