Abstract:Introduction To ensure effective and evidence-based care in sexual health, treatment must account for diverse gender identities and experiences. One-size-fits-all treatments fail to account for the diverse sociocultural determinants that influence sexual health outcomes. Today science recognizes the necessity of culturally sensitive treatments that consider sociocultural determinants such as ethnicity, religion, language, socioeconomic status and, critically, gender. Gender, as a key sociocultural determinant, significantly impacts the experience and treatment of sexual dysfunction, necessitating gender-sensitive approaches. Objective The aim of this study is to critically review literature on gender sensitivity in the treatment of sexual dysfunction, identify gaps, and propose recommendations for developing culturally and gender-sensitive clinical practices. Methods A systematic literature review of studies addressing gender differences in the treatment of sexual dysfunction was conducted. We combined and searched MeSH terms using databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo and PsycINFO. We focused on treatment modalities, patient outcomes, sociocultural determinants, and gender-sensitivity in clinical practice. Results Significant gender disparities exist in the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of sexual dysfunctions. Men more frequently report erectile dysfunction, while women report higher rates of desire and arousal disorders. Transgender and non-binary individuals often face higher rates of sexual dysfunction due to minority stress and inadequate healthcare. Regarding treatment approaches and outcomes based on gender, men frequently receive pharmacological treatments, such as PDE5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction, whereas women are often prescribed hormonal therapies or referred to psychosexual counseling for issues such as desire and arousal disorders. Transgender and non-binary individuals face unique challenges, including minority stress, provider bias, and inadequate healthcare access. Regarding therapy, psychological interventions for men may focus on performance anxiety, relationship issues, and psychological causes of erectile dysfunction while for women, therapy often addresses broader issues like body image, past trauma, emotional intimacy, and relationship dynamics, which can significantly impact desire and arousal. Also, when it comes to male sexual (dys)function, social stigma around discussing ED can lead to underreporting, but there is generally a higher public awareness and more direct marketing of treatments. While with women there is often less public awareness and more stigma surrounding female sexual dysfunction, leading to underdiagnosis and undertreatment. Sociocultural expectations around women's sexual roles and behaviors also influence their experiences and treatment-seeking behaviors. Most treatment protocols reviewed lack customization based on gender-specific needs and broader sociocultural contexts. Conclusions This review highlights the critical need for integrating gender sensitivity into the treatment of sexual dysfunction. The significant gender disparities in prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment underscore the inadequacy of one-size-fits-all approaches. Our findings emphasize that treatment protocols must be customized to address the specific needs of different gender identities and consider broader sociocultural contexts. Culturally sensitive treatments that incorporate factors such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and gender are essential for improving patient outcomes. Future research should focus on developing and validating gender-sensitive treatment protocols and training healthcare providers to deliver inclusive and effective care. By addressing these gaps, sexual medicine can better serve diverse populations, ultimately promoting holistic sexual health and well-being. Disclosure No.

Women's Gender Sensitivity in Latin American Cognitive Behavioral Studies: A Review of the Literature

(301) Gender Sensitivity In The Treatment Of Sexual (Dys)Function: A Critical Review And Future Directions

Gender, women and scientific research

Empathy, well-being, and mental health: do gender differences diminish by the end of medical school?

Coping strategies for dealing with gender norms that negatively impact women’s mental health. An evaluation of a group intervention

Mujeres Unidas: A Pilot Study to Educate Latina Women

Relationship between gender roles, motherhood beliefs and mental health

Gender Matters: A Critical Piece in Mental Health

General and healthcare-related HIV stigma among cisgender Brazilian women: the role of socioeconomic vulnerability

Psychopathological symptoms in Spanish subjects with gender dysphoria. A cross-sectional study

Sex and gender considerations in cross-cultural traumatic stress studies

Gender sensitivity of the COVID-19 mental health research in Europe: a scoping review

“Architects of Their Own Brain.” Social Impact of an Intervention Study for the Prevention of Gender-Based Violence in Adolescence

A systematic review on the prevalence of a silent female disorder in Arabic-speaking countries and the Middle East: sexual dysfunctions and the role of culture

Gender differences in the therapeutic response to lifestyle improvement-based interventions for treatment-resistant depression

Systematic Review on Socio-Emotional Skills, Academic Performance and Socio-Emotional Well-Being in Latin America

A Step Forward in Understanding Gender Differences in Parental Burnout: Parental Involvement and Emotion Regulation

A Latin American Review and Insights into Personalized Management Strategies

(018) A Pilot Study Of Online Group Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy And Sex Education For Brazilian Women With Sexual Dysfunction Or Issues

Country-level gender inequality is associated with structural differences in the brains of women and men

A historical perspective on structural-based mental health approaches in Latin America: the Chilean and Brazilian cases