Abstract:Excitement about the promise of quantum computers is tempered by the reality that the hardware remains exceptionally fragile and error prone, forming a bottleneck in the development of alternative applications. In this paper, we describe and experimentally test a fully autonomous workflow designed to deterministically suppress errors in quantum algorithms from the gate level through to circuit execution and measurement. We introduce the key elements of this workflow, delivered as a software package called Fire Opal , and survey the underlying physical concepts: error-aware compilation, automated system-wide gate optimization, automated dynamical decoupling embedding for circuit-level error cancellation, and calibration-efficient measurement-error mitigation. We then present a comprehensive suite of performance benchmarks executed on IBM hardware, demonstrating up to >1000× improvement over the best alternative expert-configured techniques available in the open literature. Benchmarking includes experiments using up to 16 qubit systems executing the following: Bernstein Vazirani, quantum Fourier transform, Grover's search, quantum approximate optimization algorithm, variational quantum eigensolver, syndrome extraction on a five-qubit quantum error-correction code, and quantum volume. Experiments reveal a strong contribution of Non-Markovian errors to baseline algorithmic performance; in all cases the deterministic error-suppression workflow delivers the highest performance and approaches incoherent error bounds without the need for any additional sampling or randomization overhead, while maintaining compatibility with all additional probabilistic error suppression techniques. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.024034 © 2023 American Physical Society

Erratum: Lower Bounds on Quantum Annealing Times ]

Erratum: Lower Bounds on Quantum Annealing Times [Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 140601 (2023)]

Tighter Lower Bounds on Quantum Annealing Times

Lower bounds for adiabatic quantum algorithms by quantum speed limits

Practical quantum digital signature with a gigahertz BB84 quantum key distribution system: erratum.

Necessary Adiabatic Run Times in Quantum Optimization

Quantum error mitigation in quantum annealing

Erratum: Dynamics of the Bounds of Squared Concurrence [phys. Rev. A 79, 032306 (2009)]

Lower Bounds on Number of QAOA Rounds Required for Guaranteed Approximation Ratios

New quantum algorithms and quantum lower bounds

Limitations of variational quantum algorithms: a quantum optimal transport approach

Correction: Corrigendum: Demon-like algorithmic quantum cooling and its realization with quantum optics

Erratum: Expressive power of parametrized quantum circuits [Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033125 (2020)]

Experimental Benchmarking of an Automated Deterministic Error-Suppression Workflow for Quantum Algorithms

Unstructured Adiabatic Quantum Optimization: Optimality with Limitations

Quantum Annealing-driven Branch and Bound for the single machine total weighted number of tardy jobs scheduling problem

A Recursive Lower Bound on the Energy Improvement of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Behavior of Analog Quantum Algorithms

Erratum: Regression-decision-tree based parameter optimization of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Erratum: Learnability of Quantum Neural Networks [PRX QUANTUM <b>2</b> , 040337 (2021)]

Optimal quantum annealing: A variational shortcut-to-adiabaticity approach