Assessment of Culicidae collection methods for xenomonitoring lymphatic filariasis in malaria co-infection context in Burkina Faso
Sanata Coulibaly,Simon P. Sawadogo,Achille S. Nikièma,Aristide S. Hien,Rabila Bamogo,Lassane Koala,Ibrahim Sangaré,Roland W. Bougma,Benjamin Koudou,Florence Fournet,Georges A. Ouédraogo,Roch K. Dabiré
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012021
2024-03-30
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Abstract:Entomological surveillance of lymphatic filariasis and malaria infections play an important role in the decision-making of national programs to control, or eliminate these both diseases. In areas where both diseases prevalence is low, a large number of mosquitoes need to be sampled to determine vectors infection rate. To do this, efficient mosquito collection methods must be used. This study is part in this framework, to assess appropriate mosquito collection methods for lymphatic filariasis xenomonitoring in a coexistence context with malaria in Burkina Faso. Mosquito collections were performed between August and September 2018 in four villages (Koulpissi, Seiga, and Péribgan, Saptan), distributed in East and South-West health regions of Burkina Faso. Different collection methods were used: Human Landing Catches (HLC) executed indoor and outdoor, Window Exit-Trap, Double Net Trap (DNT) and Pyrethrum Spray Catches (PSC). Molecular analyses were performed to identify Anopheles gambiae s . l . sibling species and to detect Wuchereria bancrofti and Plasmodium falciparum infection in Anopheles mosquitoes. A total of 3 322 mosquitoes were collected among this, Anopheles gambiae s . l . was the vector caught in largest proportion (63.82%). An . gambiae s . l . sibling species molecular characterization showed that An . gambiae was the dominant specie in all villages. The Human Landing Catches (indoor and outdoor) collected the highest proportion of mosquitoes (between 61.5% and 82.79%). For the sampling vectors infected to W . bancrofti or P . falciparum , PSC, HLC and Window Exit-Trap were found the most effective collection methods. This study revealed that HLC indoor and outdoor remained the most effective collection method. Likewise, the results showed the probability to use Window Exit-Trap and PSC collection methods to sample Anopheles infected. In Burkina Faso, the monitoring and evaluation scheme to assess the impact of lymphatic filariasis and malaria interventions is relied only on parasitological tests. While nowadays, the most simple and direct measure of vector borne diseases is xenomonitoring. When the both diseases prevalence is low in human population, sampling large numbers of mosquitoes is necessary for xenomonitoring. This study was undertaken in this context to assess the efficiency of four mosquito collection methods for xenomonitoring LF and malaria. Mosquito collections were performed between August and September 2018 in four villages, distributed in East and South-West health regions of Burkina Faso. Human Landing Catches (HLC), Window Exit-Trap, Double Net Trap (DNT) and Pyrethrum Spray Catches (PSC) were evaluated. The results showed that HLC remained the most effective collection method by collecting the highest number of Anopheles (2 388; 71.88% of total). Across the study, mosquito infection rate for W . bancrofti and P . falciparum were 0.004 and 0.13 respectively. To collect vectors infected it was found that Window Exit-Trap and PSC were efficient. In conclusion, HLC has been shown to be appropriate for collecting large number of mosquitoes. Likewise, Window Exit-Trap and PSC can be useful for malaria and lymphatic filariasis xenomonitoring.
tropical medicine,parasitology