Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis

Qing Wang,Xiaotong Ding,Mingyue Zhu,Hongli Chen,Yanli Yang,Yanhong Wang,Zixuan Gan,Yuetfoon Chung,Zheng Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12749
2024-10-13
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Abstract:Background Managing medication interruptions is considered one of the biggest dilemmas for nurses in clinical settings. To improve medication safety, it was imperative to conduct a systematic review to get a deeper understanding of nurses' experiences with medication interruptions. Aims A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis aimed to explore clinical nurses' experiences of interruption during medication in hospitals. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The search strategy included four groups of keywords: (1) qualitative research, (2) nurses, (3) medication interruption, and (4) experience. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta‐ethnography was utilized to synthesize the findings of the included studies. Results Nine articles published between 2012 and 2023 were included; the number of participants varied from 5 to 40, aged 20–68 years, and the majority were female. Four synthesized findings were identified as follows: (1) an inevitable part of the routine, (2) a decision‐making process, (3) working in a minefield, and (4) coping with interruption. Linking Evidence to Action Nurses embraced interruptions as an inherent component of clinical care. Previous experience and nursing culture, encompassing personal and professional aspects, significantly influence nurses' attitudes toward medication interruptions. It is crucial to incorporate the distinctive work experiences of nurses into techniques aimed at efficiently handling interruptions in future research. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD42023470276.
nursing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?