Abstract:Seasonal hydrological forecasts are vital for managing water resources and adapting to climate change, aiding in diverse planning and decision-making processes. Currently it is unknown how different forecasting methods, considering initial hydrological conditions and dynamic meteorological forcing, perform across the Swedish river systems, despite the significant socio-economic implications. Here we explore the drivers that mostly impact streamflow predictions and attribute the added quality of these predictions to local hydrological regimes. We compare the accuracy of seasonal streamflow forecasts driven by dynamic GCM-based meteorological forecasts with those generated by the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) method. The analysis spans across about 39,500 sub-catchments in Sweden encompassing various climatic, geographical and human-influenced factors. Results show that the streamflow predictability varies in space due to the country's diverse hydrological regimes. Regardless of the regime, updating the models to achieve the best possible initial conditions is crucial for enhancing forecast skill across all seasons for up to 4 months. GCM-based meteorological forcing notably improves short-term streamflow accuracy, showing significant impact particularly up to 4–8 weeks lead time depending on the local hydrological regime. In the snow-driven northern regions, ESP demonstrates superior performance over GCM-based streamflow forecasts in winter. Conversely, in the southern regions, where conditions are predominantly influenced by rainfall, GCM-based forecasts show higher performance up to 4–6 weeks ahead, regardless of the season. In river systems with high human influences, streamflow climatology outperforms ESP and GCM-based forecasts underscoring the challenges of accurately modelling artificial reservoir management and the need for better access to management data. These insights guide the development of an advanced national seasonal hydrological forecasting service, and highlight the need for region-specific forecasting strategies indicating areas where predictability is enhanced by improved monitoring, hence initial conditions, and/or meteorological forcings. Finally, we discuss the applicability of these forecasting methods to other regions worldwide, thereby placing our new insights within a global context. Plain Language Summary Our research focuses on improving streamflow predictability in Sweden, especially looking ahead to the coming weeks to seasons. We compare the Ensemble Streamflow Predictions (ESP) method that uses historical weather data to predict future streamflows, and a dynamic forecasting method based on bias-adjusted ECMWF SEAS5 system that considers current weather conditions and predicts how climate evolves. We cover all river systems across Sweden, each with unique climatic and physiographic characteristics. Streamflow predictions based on SEAS5 are generally more accurate than ESP in the short term, regardless of the season; however, for longer time horizons, ESP often becomes just as good, if not better, especially in winter. We show that one single forecasting method may not work best for all areas depending on the regional hydrological regime and the season. ESP is more effective in handling the variability caused by snow and rain, which is crucial in determining streamflow in the northern mountainous areas. In southern Sweden, where streamflow is more influenced by rainfall than snow, SEAS5 generates more accurate streamflow in the short term for up to 6 weeks ahead. In regions with large rivers controlled by human interventions, neither method consistently outperforms the other, even in the short term.

Improving subseasonal forecast of precipitation in Europe by combining a stochastic weather generator with dynamical models

Improving the Seasonal Forecast of Summer Precipitation in China Using a Dynamical-Statistical Approach

Development and Evaluation of a Pan-European Multimodel Seasonal Hydrological Forecasting System

Multivariate post‐processing of probabilistic sub‐seasonal weather regime forecasts

Leveraging GCM-based forecasts for enhanced seasonal streamflow prediction in diverse hydrological regimes

Multivariate post-processing of probabilistic sub-seasonal weather regime forecasts

Evaluation of the European Seasonal forecast Models for hydrological forecasting for improved water management in Africa

Evaluation of subseasonal precipitation forecasts in the Uruguay River basin

The suitability of a seasonal ensemble hybrid framework including data-driven approaches for hydrological forecasting

Post-processing sub-seasonal precipitation forecasts at various spatiotemporal scales across China during boreal summer monsoon

Improving dynamical‐statistical subseasonal precipitation forecasts using deep learning: A case study in Southwest China

Predicting precipitation on the decadal timescale: A prototype climate service for the hydropower sector

A statistical–dynamical approach for probabilistic prediction of sub-seasonal precipitation anomalies over 17 hydroclimatic regions in China

Sub-seasonal forecasting with a large ensemble of deep-learning weather prediction models

Probabilistic seasonal precipitation forecasts using quantiles of ensemble forecasts

Postprocessing of Ensemble Weather Forecasts Using a Stochastic Weather Generator

Adaptive Bias Correction for Improved Subseasonal Forecasting

Hybrid statistical–dynamical seasonal prediction of summer extreme temperatures in Europe

Improving sub-seasonal wind-speed forecasts in Europe with a non-linear model

Process‐Informed Subsampling Improves Subseasonal Rainfall Forecasts in Central America