Stimulus‐induced rotary saturation imaging of visually evoked response: A pilot study

Milena Capiglioni,Roland Beisteiner,Pedro Lima Cardoso,Federico Turco,Baudouin Jin,Claus Kiefer,Simon Daniel Robinson,Andrea Federspiel,Siegfried Trattnig,Roland Wiest

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5280

2024-11-06

NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract:This study investigates the stimulus‐induced rotary saturation (SIRS) signal response in healthy volunteers under visual stimulation and proposes an experimental and post‐processing pipeline to distinguish rotary saturation contrast from physiological and hemodynamic confounds. SIRS detected activation in the visual cortex at the group level, but the proposed acquisition could not reliably detect activation at the individual subject level. Further improvements in sequence and experimental protocol are suggested. Spin‐lock (SL) pulses have been proposed to directly detect neuronal activity otherwise inaccessible through standard functional magnetic resonance imaging. However, the practical limits of this technique remain unexplored. Key challenges in SL‐based detection include ultra‐weak signal variations, sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneities, and potential contamination from blood oxygen level‐dependent effects, all of which hinder the reliable isolation of neuronal signals. This pilot study evaluates the performance of the stimulus‐induced rotary saturation (SIRS) technique to map visual stimulation response in the human cortex. A rotary echo spin‐lock (RESL) preparation followed by a 2D echo planar imaging readout was used to investigate 12 healthy subjects at rest and during continuous exposure to 8 Hz flickering light. The SL amplitude was fixed to the target neuroelectric oscillations at that frequency. The signal variance was used as contrast metric, and two alternative post‐processing pipelines (regression‐filtering‐rectification and normalized subtraction) were statistically evaluated. Higher variance in the SL signal was detected in four of the 12 subjects. Although group‐level analysis indicated activation in the occipital pole, analysis of variance revealed that this difference was not statistically significant, highlighting the need for comparable control measures and more robust preparations. Further optimization in sensitivity and robustness is required to noninvasively detect physiological neuroelectric activity in the human brain.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,biophysics,spectroscopy