Assessing the value of a pelvic drain for urinary leak after robotic radical prostatectomy

Eugenio Bologna,Hilly Perlman,Idan Zeeman,Tomer Bashi,Karin Lifshitz,Avi Beri,Roy Mano,Ofer Yossepowitch,Snir Dekalo,Yuval Bar‐Yosef,Ziv Savin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-1633.12693
2024-05-06
Surgical Practice
Abstract:Aim The value of post‐operative pelvic drain placement after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for the purpose of diagnosing post‐operative complications is undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of pelvic drain outputs in predicting post‐operative early‐onset urinary leaks from a vesicourethral anastomosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 204 consecutive patients who underwent RARP in our institution between 2018 and 2022. The daily outputs of the drain and the urinary catheter were measured, and patients with early‐onset anastomotic urinary leak were compared with those who were free of any leak. The association between post‐operative drain output and the presence of urinary leak was investigated by regression analyses. Results Post‐operative early‐onset leak was present in six patients (3.4%) whose baseline characteristics were not different from those of patients with no leak. The median pelvic drain output on post‐operative day 1 (D‐POD1) was 80 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 51–150 mL) and 122 mL (IQR 62–200 mL) on D‐POD2. The median D‐POD1 of patients with a leak was significantly higher than those without one (250 mL vs 80 mL, respectively; P 227 mL and the presence of urinary leak (odds ratio 35; P
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?