Antagonism of 5‐HT2 receptors attenuates self‐sustained firing of human motor units

Benjamin I. Goodlich,Gregory E. P. Pearcey,Alessandro Del Vecchio,Sean A. Horan,Justin J. Kavanagh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp285867
2024-03-21
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend High‐density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) was recorded from the tibialis anterior during two distinct contraction protocols. Both protocols featured steady‐state isometric contractions with a constant descending drive to the motoneurone pool. However, one protocol also included an additional phase of superimposed descending drive. Adding and then removing the descending drive in the middle of steady‐state contractions altered motor unit (MU) firing behaviour across the motor pool, where newly recruited units in the superimposed phase were unable to switch off. The 5‐HT2 receptor antagonist, cyproheptadine, was then administered to determine whether changes in MU firing were mediated by serotonergic mechanisms. 5‐HT2 receptor antagonism caused reductions in the MU discharge rate, recruitment threshold and self‐sustained firing duration. These findings indicate that serotonergic neuromodulation plays a key role in facilitating the discharge and self‐sustained firing of human motoneurones, where adaptive changes in MU recruitment must occur to meet the demands of the contraction. 5‐HT2 receptors on motoneurones play a critical role in facilitating persistent inward currents (PICs). Although facilitation of PICs can enhance self‐sustained firing after periods of excitation, the relationship between 5‐HT2 receptor activity and self‐sustained firing in human motor units (MUs) has not been resolved. MU activity was assessed from the tibialis anterior of 10 healthy adults (24.9 ± 2.8 years) during two contraction protocols. Both protocols featured steady‐state isometric contractions with constant descending drive to the motoneurone pool. However, one protocol also included an additional phase of superimposed descending drive. Adding and then removing descending drive in the middle of steady‐state contractions altered MU firing behaviour across the motor pool, where newly recruited units in the superimposed phase were unable to switch off (P = 0.0002), and units recruited prior to additional descending drive reduced their discharge rates (P
neurosciences,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?