Comparison of different methods of screening to identify intimate partner violence: A randomized controlled trial

Phyllis Sharps,Linda Bullock,Nancy Perrin,Jacquelyn Campbell,Kimberly Hill,Iye Kanu,Meg Norling,Nancy G. Russell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13279
2024-01-25
Public Health Nursing
Abstract:Objective Screening for intimate partner violence in the home is often challenging due to the lack of privacy. The aim of this study was to compare two different screening methods (paper‐pencil vs. tablet) for identifying intimate partner violence during perinatal home visits. Design Randomized control trial. Sample Pregnant women (N = 416) in perinatal home visiting programs were randomized to either paper‐pencil or computer assisted, intimate partner violence screening. Measurements The Abuse Assessment Screen was used to screen for physical and sexual IPV and Women's Experiences with Battering for emotional intimate partner violence. Results No significant differences in prevalence were found between the screening methods. Intimate partner violence prevalence rates for the year before and/or during pregnancy using paper‐pencil was 21.8% versus 24.5% using tablets (p = .507). There were significant differences in prevalence among the three race/ethnic groups (Caucasian, 36.9%; African American, 26.7%; Hispanics, 10.6%; p
nursing,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?