Abstract:Effective water quality management and reliable environmental modeling depend on the availability, size, and quality of water quality (WQ) data. Observed stream water quality data are usuallEEy sparse in both time and space. Reconstruction of water quality time series using surrogate variables such as streamflow have been used to evaluate risk metrics such as reliability, resilience, vulnerability, and watershed health (WH) but only at gauged locations. Estimating these indices for ungauged watersheds has not been attempted because of the high-dimensional nature of the potential predictor space. In this study, machine learning (ML) models, namely random forest regression, AdaBoost, gradient boosting machines, and Bayesian ridge regression (along with an ensemble model), were evaluated to predict watershed health and other risk metrics at ungauged hydrologic unit code 10 (HUC-10) basins using watershed attributes, long-term climate data, soil data, land use and land cover data, fertilizer sales data, and geographic information as predictor variables. These ML models were tested over the Upper Mississippi River Basin, the Ohio River Basin, and the Maumee River Basin for water quality constituents such as suspended sediment concentration, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Random forest, AdaBoost, and gradient boosting regressors typically showed a coefficient of determination R2>0.8 for suspended sediment concentration and nitrogen during the testing stage, while the ensemble model exhibited R2>0.95. Watershed health values with respect to suspended sediments and nitrogen predicted by all ML models including the ensemble model were lower for areas with larger agricultural land use, moderate for areas with predominant urban land use, and higher for forested areas; the trained ML models adequately predicted WH in ungauged basins. However, low WH values (with respect to phosphorus) were predicted at some basins in the Upper Mississippi River Basin that had dominant forest land use. Results suggest that the proposed ML models provide robust estimates at ungauged locations when sufficient training data are available for a WQ constituent. ML models may be used as quick screening tools by decision makers and water quality monitoring agencies for identifying critical source areas or hotspots with respect to different water quality constituents, even for ungauged watersheds.

Data engineering for predictive machine learning of stormwater infrastructure conditions

Urban storm water prediction by applying machine learning techniques and geomorphological characteristics

Developing data-driven learning models to predict urban stormwater runoff volume

Machine Learning and Statistical Test–Based Culvert Condition Impact Factor Analysis

Machine learning based water pipe failure prediction: The effects of engineering, geology, climate and socio-economic factors

Real-Time Flood Disaster Prediction System by Applying Machine Learning Technique

Data-driven Modeling of Combined Sewer Systems for Urban Sustainability: An Empirical Evaluation

Tool for fast assessment of stormwater flood volumes for urban catchment: A machine learning approach

Evaluating the Utility of Selected Machine Learning Models for Predicting Stormwater Levels in Small Streams

Urban Pluvial Flooding Prediction by Machine Learning Approaches – a Case Study of Shenzhen City, China

The use of decision tree based predictive models for improving the culvert inspection process

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Watershed Health Indices for Sediments and Nutrients at Ungauged Basins

Unraveling the complexities of urban fluvial flood hydraulics through AI

Prediction of Hydraulic Blockage at Cross Drainage Structures using Regression Analysis

Predicting flood stages in watersheds with different scales using hourly rainfall dataset: A high-volume rainfall features empowered machine learning approach

Using Machine Learning to Assess the Risk of and Prevent Water Main Breaks

Leveraging deep learning techniques for condition assessment of stormwater pipe network

Assessing Surface Water Flood Risks in Urban Areas Using Machine Learning

Can artificial intelligence and data-driven machine learning models match or even replace process-driven hydrologic models for streamflow simulation?: A case study of four watersheds with different hydro-climatic regions across the CONUS

Predictive Analytics for Water Asset Management: Machine Learning and Survival Analysis

Physics Guided Machine Learning Methods for Hydrology