Abstract:While power-relationship commitment theory in relationship marketing area has been established well in the west literature, few studies examine the robustness of it in the Chinese context with a different culture. The generalization of power-relationship commitment theory in supply chain triple relationships may also extend our knowledge in this important area. Most of the previous studies on power-relationship commitment only investigated the relationship between two major types of power and one or two types of relationship commitment in the dyadic inter-organizational relationships. Five types of power used by the suppliers or customers and their impacts on manufacturers’ two types of relationship commitment are examined based on 617 manufacturing companies in Chinese supply chains. The influence of two types of relationship commitment on supply chain performance is also investigated in this study from the perspectives of both suppliers and customers. The results indicate that the impacts of customers’ use of power on relationship commitment are different from the impacts of suppliers’ use of power. Suppliers’ use of expert and reward power increases manufacturers’ both normative and instrumental relationship commitment. But, suppliers’ use of coercive power decreases manufacturers’ normative relationship commitment. In contrast, Customers’ use of expert power, referent power and reward power has a positive impact on manufacturers’ normative relationship commitment, but customers’ use of coercive power has a negative impact. Customers’ use of reward power and coercive power has a positive effect on manufacturers’ instrumental relationship commitment, but customers’ use of legitimate power has a negative effect. Except for expert power, customers’ use of power is more effective to influence manufacturers’ relationship commitment than suppliers’ use of power. The results also reveal that normative relationship commitment improve supply chain performance directly.

The Impact of Supply Chain Relationship Structure on Governance Performance: A Threshold Effect Analysis

A Study of Effects of Supply Chain Relationship Capital on Cooperation Performance under Global Sourcing Circumstances

Diversify or Concentrate: the Impact of Customer Concentration on Corporate Social Responsibility

Supply Chain Concentration, Financing Constraints, and Carbon Performance

Analysis of the Impact of Supply Chain Relationship Strategy on Corporate Cash Dividend Policy Based on Chinese Data

The Impact of Power on Relationship Commitment in Supply Chains

Research on the Influence of Corporate Governance Structure on Corporate Financial Performance

Do Big Customers Influence Listed Firms’ Performance? Based on Supplier–customer Relationships in China

Supply chain concentration and financial performance: the moderating roles of marketing and operational capabilities

Supply chain network structures and firm financial performance: the moderating role of international relations

The effect of stability and concentration of upstream and downstream relationships of focal firms on two-level trade credit

The Impact of Relationship Commitment on Supply Chain Integration and Company Performance

The influence of internal corporate governance mechanisms on capital structure decisions of Chinese listed firms

Corporate governance and capital structure: dynamic panel threshold analysis

Impact of just-in-time (JIT) on supply chain disruption risk: the moderating role of supply chain centralization

Does Corporate Governance Enhance Common Interests of Shareholders and Primary Stakeholders?

THE IMPACTS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF CHINESE DUAL-LISTED COMPANIES

Toward suppliers' corporate social responsibility performance: the role of relationship dependence

Bargaining Power of Suppliers and Buyers, and Corporate Performance——Evidences from Chinese Manufacturing Listed Companies from 2005 to 2007

Do corporate governance structure and capital structure matter for the performance of the firms? An empirical testing with the contemplation of outliers

Digital transformation and supply chain concentration: evidence from China