Impact of text difficulty and visual emphasis on pediatric neuropsychological evaluation reports: The parent's perspective

Melissa Gerstle Julia Fleming Beattie James Peugh Thea L. Quinton Anne Bradley Brenna LeJeune Dean W. Beebe a Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center,Cincinnati,OH,USAb Department of Pediatrics,University of Cincinnati College of Medicine,Cincinnati,OH,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2366018
2024-06-22
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Abstract:Objective: Despite varying opinions, little research has examined how to best write pediatric neuropsychology reports. Method: This study gathered input from 230 parents on how text difficulty (reading level) and visual emphasis (bullets, underline, italics) affect report readability and utility. We focused on the most-read report section: summary/impressions. Each parent rated the readability and usefulness of a generic summary/impressions section written in four different styles. The four styles crossed text difficulty (high school-vs-collegiate) with use of visual emphasis (absent-vs-present). Results: Parents found versions with easier text to be more clearly written, easier to follow, and easier to find information ( p <.001). Parents rated those with harder text to be overly detailed, complex, hard to understand, and hard to read ( p <.001). Visual emphasis made it easier to find key information and the text easier to follow and understand – but primarily for versions that were written in difficult text (interaction p ≤.026). After rating all four styles, parents picked their preference. They most often picked versions written in easier text with visual emphasis ( p <.001). Conclusions: Findings support writing styles that use easier text difficulty and visual emphasis.
psychology, clinical,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?