Abstract:With wide deployment of deep neural network (DNN) classifiers, there is great potential for harm from adversarial learning attacks. Recently, a special type of data poisoning (DP) attack, known as a backdoor (or Trojan), was proposed. These attacks do not seek to degrade classification accuracy, but rather to have the classifier learn to classify to a target class t∗ whenever the backdoor pattern is present in a test example originally from a source class s∗ . Launching backdoor attacks does not require knowledge of the classifier or its training process-only the ability to poison the training set with exemplars containing a backdoor pattern (labeled with the target class). Defenses against backdoors can be deployed before/during training, post-training, or at test time. Here, we address post-training detection in DNN image classifiers, seldom considered in existing works, wherein the defender does not have access to the poisoned training set, but only to the trained classifier itself, as well as to clean (unpoisoned) examples from the classification domain. This scenario is of great interest because e.g., a classifier may be the basis of a phone app that will be shared with many users. Detection may thus reveal a widespread attack. We propose a purely unsupervised anomaly detection (AD) defense against imperceptible backdoor attacks that: 1) detects whether the trained DNN has been backdoor-attacked; 2) infers the source and target classes in a detected attack; 3) estimates the backdoor pattern itself. Our AD approach involves learning (via suitable cost function minimization) the minimum size/norm perturbation (putative backdoor) required to induce the classifier to misclassify (most) examples from class s to class t , for all (s,t) pairs. Our hypothesis is that nonattacked pairs require large perturbations, while the attacked pair (s∗, t∗) requires much smaller ones. This is convincingly borne out experimentally. We identify a variety of plausible cost functions and devise a novel, robust hypothesis testing approach to perform detection inference. We test our approach, in comparison with the state-of-the-art methods, for several backdoor patterns, attack settings and mechanisms, and data sets and demonstrate its favorability. Our defense essentially requires setting a single hyperparameter (the detection threshold), which can e.g., be chosen to fix the system's false positive rate.

Defending Against Backdoor Attacks by Quarantine Training

ATTEQ-NN: Attention-based QoE-aware Evasive Backdoor Attacks.

Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Process

ARTEMIS: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Via Distribution Shift

Beating Backdoor Attack at Its Own Game

ACQ: Few-shot Backdoor Defense Via Activation Clipping and Quantizing

Backdoor Defense via Adaptively Splitting Poisoned Dataset

Test-Time Backdoor Defense via Detecting and Repairing

Need for Speed: Taming Backdoor Attacks with Speed and Precision

Trap and Replace: Defending Backdoor Attacks by Trapping Them into an Easy-to-Replace Subnetwork

Backdoor Cleansing with Unlabeled Data

A Novel Backdoor Attack Adapted to Transfer Learning.

Not All Samples Are Born Equal: Towards Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks

UltraClean: A Simple Framework to Train Robust Neural Networks against Backdoor Attacks

Mitigating Backdoor Attack by Injecting Proactive Defensive Backdoor

Reverse Engineering Imperceptible Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Detection and Training Set Cleansing

NBA: defensive distillation for backdoor removal via neural behavior alignment

UNIT: Backdoor Mitigation via Automated Neural Distribution Tightening

Rethinking Backdoor Attacks

Detection of Backdoors in Trained Classifiers Without Access to the Training Set

Partial train and isolate, mitigate backdoor attack