Abstract:Background Epigenetic clocks are promising tools for the study of aging in humans. The clocks quantify biological aging above and beyond chronological age, demonstrate systematic associations with risk factors that accelerate aging, and predict age-related morbidity and mortality. There is interest in using them as surrogate endpoints in intervention studies. However, the large number of clocks, decentralized publication and explosive popularity in the last decade has made for poor accessibility and standardization. This has hampered the abilities of new researchers to conduct truly hypothesis driven research—whether by not knowing about the best available clocks for a given question, or by systematically testing many or all as they become available. Results We report a centralized R package which can be installed and run locally on the user’s machine, and provides a standardized syntax for epigenetic clock calculation. The package includes a set of helper functions to assist with navigating clock literature and selecting clocks for analysis, as well as affording the user with the details of clock calculation. We describe each clock’s resilience to missing CpG information, combined with functionality to assess the need for imputation in the user’s own data. Furthermore, we demonstrate that while CpGs may not be shared among clocks with similar outputs, many clocks have highly correlated outputs. Conclusions Due to the previous decentralization of epigenetic clocks, gathering code and performing systematic analysis, particularly in protected datasets, has required significant information gathering effort. Here, we offer an R package with standardized implementation and potential for future growth and clock incorporation to assist with hypothesis driven investigation of aging as measured by epigenetic clocks. We show the potential of this package to drive the user to think globally about signals captured by epigenetic clocks, as well as to properly identify the potential and limitations of each clock in their current research.

Biological Clocks: Why We Need Them, Why We Cannot Trust Them, How They Might Be Improved

When to Trust Epigenetic Clocks: Avoiding False Positives in Aging Interventions.

How does the body know how old it is?

An evaluation of aging measures: from biomarkers to clocks

R Methylcipher: A Methylation Clock Investigational Package for Hypothesis-Driven Evaluation & Research

Comparative analysis of epigenetic aging clocks from CpG characteristics to functional associations

Epigenetic drift underlies epigenetic clock signals, but displays distinct responses to lifespan interventions, development, and cellular dedifferentiation

Epigenetic clock: A promising biomarker and practical tool in aging

A systematic review of phenotypic and epigenetic clocks used for aging and mortality quantification in humans

Molecular clocks and the human condition: approaching their characterization in human physiology and disease

Cell-type specific epigenetic clocks to quantify biological age at cell-type resolution

Contextualizing aging clocks and properly describing biological age

The Ticking of Aging Clocks.

Underlying features of epigenetic aging clocks in vivo and in vitro

Clocks not winding down: unravelling circadian networks

DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing

Many chronological aging clocks can be found throughout the epigenome: Implications for quantifying biological aging

Development of an epigenetic clock resistant to changes in immune cell composition

Dissecting the impact of differentiation stage, replicative history, and cell type composition on epigenetic clocks

Comprehensive Insights from Molecular Targets and Biomarkers to Biological Clocks

What makes clocks tick? Characterizing developmental dynamics of adult epigenetic clock sites