Improved outcome of children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia by addition of cladribine to re‐induction chemotherapy

Min Ruan,Li‐Peng Liu,Ao‐Li Zhang,Ben Quan Qi,Fang Liu,Tian‐Feng Liu,Xiao‐Ming Liu,Xiao‐Juan Chen,Wen‐Yu Yang,Ye Guo,Li Zhang,Yao Zou,Yu‐Mei Chen,Xiao‐Fan Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3681
IF: 4.711
2021-01-24
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>The preferred salvage treatment for children with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R‐AML) remains unclear. The combination of cladribine/Ara‐C/granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor and mitoxantrone (CLAG‐M) shown promising results in adult R/R‐AML. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of CLAG‐M versus mitoxantrone/etoposide/cytarabine (MEC) or idarubicin/etoposide/cytarabine (IEC) in R/R‐AML children.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Fifty‐five R/R‐AML children were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) at 3‐year were documented. Karyotype or mutations status were summarized as different risk groups.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The ORR was achieved in 80% (16/20) and 51% (18/35) of patients after one‐cycle of CLAG‐M and MEC/IEC treatment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The CLAG‐M group's OS (66.8% ± 16.2% vs. 40.4% ± 10.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.019) and PFS (52.6% ± 13.7% vs. 34.9% ± 9.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.036) at 3‐year was significantly higher than the MEC/IEC group. In high‐risk patients, 33.3% experienced progression of disease (PD) and 22.2% dead in CLAG‐M group, while 50% experienced PD and 43.8% dead in MEC/IEC. When it comes to low‐risk group, none of them in CLAG‐M experienced PD or death, while up to 50% of patients received MEC/IEC suffered PD, and all of them died eventually. Similar results were also found in the intermediate‐risk group. Surprisingly, the presence of <i>FLT3‐ITD</i> was associated with poor outcome in both groups. The most common adverse events were hematologic toxicities, and the incidence was similar in both group. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>CLAG‐M group demonstrated effective palliation along with acceptable toxicity in R/R‐AML patients. However, patients with <i>FLT3‐ITD</i> may benefit less from CLAG‐M, owing to higher PD rate and all‐cause mortality than other patients. </p></section>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?