Comparison of En Bloc Resection and Intralesional Excision for Re‐resection of Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine

Hua Zhou,Yanchao Tang,Panpan Hu,Shuheng Zhai,Xiaoguang Liu,Zhongjun Liu,Feng Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13999
2024-01-30
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Our findings highlight the trade‐off between lower recurrence rates with en bloc resection and the higher risk of perioperative complications, helping clinicians make informed decisions when choosing the most appropriate surgical technique for the patients undergoing re‐resection for giant cell tumors of the spine. Objective Re‐resection of spinal giant cell tumors is an exceedingly difficult procedure. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with en bloc resection or intralesional excision for re‐resection has rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of en bloc resection with that of intralesional excision in patients undergoing re‐resection for giant cell tumors of the spine. Methods This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent revision surgeries for relapse of giant cell tumors of the spine at our center between January 2005 and January 2021. Local progression‐free survival represents the duration between en bloc resection or intralesional excision and tumor recurrence. Neurological recovery, survival rates, local control, and complications were evaluated. The Kaplan–Meier estimator was used for survival analysis. Results A total of 22 patients (nine men and 13 women) with a mean age of 34.1 (range 19–63) years were included. Significant statistical differences were found in the local tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with en bloc resection and those treated with intralesional excision (p
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?