Abstract:Background Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) in patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the generalizability of these findings in real-world clinical settings remains to be determined. We aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness of ARNI versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB)on clinical outcomes in HF patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Methods Patient-level data was derived from the China Cardiovascular Association Database-HF Center Registry. We included exclusively a subpopulation of HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and comorbid with hypertension. Patients prescripted with ARNI at discharge and sustaining to ARNI therapy during follow-up were categorized as the ARNI group, while those maintaining the usage of ACEI/ARB after discharge were designated as the ACEI/ARB group. In complete cases, the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at one year was assessed by the 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method. Results In all HF patients with LVEF >40% comorbid with hypertension, the usage of ARNI has increased from 0.9% in 2017 to 37.2% in 2021. A total of 3348 patients in the ARNI group and 7688 patients in the ACEI/ARB group were identified for comparative effectiveness. After 1:1 PSM, 5482 patients were included in the primary analysis, with 2741 patients in each treatment arm. The proportion of patients receiving higher dosages of ARNI (200mg/d and 400mg/d) was 20.9%, 26.6%, 29.2%, and 30.3% at discharge, 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year, respectively. Over the 1-year follow-up, ARNI was associated with a 20% relative reduction in all-cause death compared to the ACEI/ARB therapy (10.5% vs. 12.9%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94], P=0.005). The absolute risk difference in all-cause death between ARNI and ACEI/ARB arms was 2.88 per 100 patient-years (incidence rate difference, -2.88 [95% CI, -4.86 to -0.9]). Cardiovascular death also tended to decrease in the ARNI group but with missed statistical significance (4.5% vs. 4.9%, adjusted HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.70-1.14], P=0.373). Treatment benefits were more significant in those with LVEF between 40-50% (adjusted HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.48-0.79]), 50-60% (adjusted HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.68-1.06]), but not observed in HF patients with LVEF>60% (adjusted HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.08-2.98]; Pinteraction<0.001). Conclusion In real-world clinical settings, treatment with ARNI was associated with a significant relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with ACEI/ARB in HF patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF. The cardiovascular benefit was concentrated in patients with LVEF ≤60%.

Global use of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in heart failure and reduced, below normal and supranormal ejection fraction

Real-World Experience of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study

State of the art on angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors

Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on physical activity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, monitored by implantable electronic device home monitoring

Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Across Ejection Fraction and Acuity Spectra in Heart Failure ∗

Real-world experience of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in patients with heart failure and dialysis

Effects of sacubitril-valsartan on heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors on clinical outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: real-world evidence from the CCA Database-HF Center

Association Between Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Use and Clinical Outcomes in Concurrent Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and End-Stage Renal Disease

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction Combined With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

Angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan on Survival and Cardiac Remodeling in Hypotensive Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study

Comparative analysis of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Effect Of Angiotensin-receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor By Different Dose On Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling According To On-treatment Blood Pressure

Characteristics, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to a 1-Year Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment

Impact of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition (ARNI) in improving ejection fraction and left and right ventricular remodeling in heart failure

Real world evidence of Sacubitril/Valsartan in octogenarian patients with heart failure. Results From the PARACHUTE-HF Study

Effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor on ketone body metabolism in pre-heart failure/heart failure patients

Long-term effects of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: A retrospective cohort study

Use and Benefit of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction