Abstract:We used fixed‐wing drones and Beyond Visual Line of Sight flying to create high‐resolution imagery and Digital Surface Models (DSMs) of six large king penguin colonies (colony population sizes ranging from 10,671 to 132,577 pairs) in South Georgia. We used a novel DSM‐based method to facilitate automated and semi‐automated counts of each colony to estimate population size. We compared these DSM‐derived counts with several other frequently used counting and post‐processing methodologies, including population counts from satellite imagery to compare accuracy and effort, in comparison with four manually counted colonies. We randomly subsampled four known colonies to test the most efficient and accurate methods for density‐based counts, including at the colony edge, where population density is lower. Sub‐sampling quadrats (each 25 m2) together with DSM‐based counts offered the best compromise between accuracy and effort. Where high‐resolution drone imagery was available, accuracy was within 3.5%. DSM methods were more accurate than several traditional methods including estimation from satellite imagery and are applicable for population studies across other taxa worldwide. These results and methods will be used to inform and develop a long‐term king penguin monitoring programme. Drones are being increasingly used to monitor wildlife populations; their large spatial coverage and minimal disturbance make them ideal for use in remote environments where access and time are limited. The methods used to count resulting imagery need consideration as they can be time‐consuming and costly. In this study, we used a fixed‐wing drone and Beyond Visual Line of Sight flying to create high‐resolution imagery and digital surface models (DSMs) of six large king penguin colonies (colony population sizes ranging from 10,671 to 132,577 pairs) in South Georgia. We used a novel DSM‐based method to facilitate automated and semi‐automated counts of each colony to estimate population size. We assessed these DSM‐derived counts against other popular counting and post‐processing methodologies, including those from satellite imagery, and compared these to the results from four colonies counted manually to evaluate accuracy and effort. We randomly subsampled four colonies to test the most efficient and accurate methods for density‐based counts, including at the colony edge, where population density is lower. Sub‐sampling quadrats (each 25 m2) together with DSM‐based counts offered the best compromise between accuracy and effort. Where high‐resolution drone imagery was available, accuracy was within 3.5% of manual reference counts. DSM methods were more accurate than other established methods including estimation from satellite imagery and are applicable for population studies across other taxa worldwide. Results and methods will be used to inform and develop a long‐term king penguin monitoring programme.

A comparison of thermal drones and camera trap population estimates for Sitka black‐tailed deer in Alaska

Evaluation of drone surveys for ungulates in southwestern rangelands

Using UAVs Equipped With Thermal Cameras To Survey A Known Population Of White-tailed Deer

Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data

Comparison of thermal cameras and human observers to estimate population density of fallow deer (Dama dama) from aerial surveys in Tasmania, Australia

Comparison of soil eDNA to camera traps for assessing mammal and bird community composition and site use

Spy in the sky: Application of thermal drones to assist with ground darting wildlife

An Empirical Evaluation of Camera Trap Study Design: How Many, How Long and When?

Motion‐sensitive cameras track population abundance changes in a boreal mammal community in southwestern Yukon, Canada

Using camera traps and N‐mixture models to estimate population abundance: Model selection really matters

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of drones, camera trapping and passive acoustic recorders in detecting changes in koala occupancy

Monitoring GPS‐collared moose by ground versus drone approaches: efficiency and disturbance effects

A comparison of established and digital surface model (DSM)‐based methods to determine population estimates and densities for king penguin colonies, using fixed‐wing drone and satellite imagery

Monitoring Animal Populations With Cameras Using Open, Multistate, N‐Mixture Models

Ground-based counting methods underestimate true numbers of a threatened colonial mammal: an evaluation using drone-based thermal surveys as a reference

Incorporating telemetry information into capture‐recapture analyses improves precision and accuracy of abundance estimates given spatiotemporally biased recapture effort

How Long is Enough to Detect Terrestrial Animals? Estimating the Minimum Trapping Effort on Camera Traps

Can we count you: validating density estimation methods for unmarked wildlife with camera traps

A statistical population reconstruction model for wildlife populations: A case study with white‐tailed deer and fisher

Drone images afford more detections of marine wildlife than real-time observers during simultaneous large-scale surveys

Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveying marine fauna: assessing detection probability