Abstract:Introduction: The left (LV) and right (RV) ventricles are intrinsically linked directly via shared myofiber and an interventricular septum and indirectly via a closed loop hemodynamic circuit [1], a phenomenon known as ventricular interdependence. While this interdependence has been investigated for over a century [1], the individual contributions of these elements require further investigation and quantification, particularly in heart failure (HF). To address this, we performed in silico experiments that quantify the influence of specific contributors individually to elucidate the effects of LV diastolic dysfunction (DD) and systolic dysfunction (SD) on RV function and vice versa. We hypothesize that our simulations will capture interventricular interactions in HF and RV compensation in LV dysfunction. Materials and Methods: We developed a 6-compartment cardiovascular model that includes a 2-compartment biventricular heart model [2] encapsulated in a simple extensible pericardium [3] and a 4-compartment electrical circuit analog-based circulation model. The ventricles are based on the TriSeg model [2], which approximates the RV and LV free walls and septum as semispherical, thick-walled segments. Active and passive cardiac myofiber mechanics, geometry, and mechanical ventricular interdependence are used to calculate biventricular pressures and volumes. We use nominally healthy values for a 70 kg person for all model parameters. To simulate SD, we reduce active contractile function in the myofiber mechanics model, and for DD, we increase passive myofiber stiffness. Systolic and diastolic function are assessed by the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR), respectively, over a range of filling volumes. Results: Acute LV SD affects neither RV systolic function nor RV diastolic function. Similarly, acute LV DD affects neither RV systolic function nor RV diastolic function. In contrast, both RV SD and RV DD impair LV filling and cause moderate LV DD with a maintained LV EF. Particularly in RV SD, the slope of the LV EDPVR is increased compared to the healthy case, suggesting LV stiffening. Note, this apparent LV stiffening is not due to either wall thickening or changes in LV passive mechanics but instead due to ventricular interactions and septal bowing. In addition, with increasing LV dysfunction the cardiac power (area of the pressure-volume loop) decreased while the RV cardiac power increased, suggesting RV compensation to maintain a healthy cardiac output. Conclusions: We observed that three dysfunction simulations (LV DD, RV SD, and RV DD) exhibit phenotypes seen in HFpEF (LV DD and EF > 50%), suggesting multiple modes of HF in HFpEF, which is consistent with and may help explain the clinical heterogeneity of HFpEF. With more refined and specific diagnostic categories of HFpEF, more targeted treatments can be developed, which will likely improv outcomes in this disease state. NIH R01HL154624 (NCC and DAB), NIH T32HL116270 (SMK), and NIH T32HL00785322 (EBR) This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Impact of Interventricular Interaction on Ventricular Function

Computational Modeling of Ventricular Interdependence in Heart Failure

Ventricular interaction and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve repair

Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Influence of right ventricular pressure and volume overload on right and left ventricular diastolic function

The Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Size and Strain in the Risk Assessment of Right Heart Failure Post - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Longitudinal analysis left ventricular chamber responses under durable LVAD support

Association between conversion to in-center nocturnal hemodialysis and right ventricular remodeling

Impact of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative

Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy in Patients With Restrictive and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Is Associated with Worse Right Ventricular Strain in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients

Relationship between left ventricular-right ventricular interlead distance and acute hemodynamic response during cardiac resynchronization therapy

The right ventricular response to high afterload: comparison between atrial switch procedure, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

The effect of afterload on right ventricular pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction: a translational study

Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling

Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator

Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?

Abstract 15339: Prediction of Severe Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricle Assist Device Using Echocardiographic Right Ventricular Dp/dt

Effects of an intra-ventricular assist device on the stroke volume of failing ventricle: Analysis of a mock circulatory system

Left Ventricular Hemodynamics with an Implanted Assist Device: An In Vitro Fluid Dynamics Study

Right Ventricular Function in Adults with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Assessed with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Detrimental Role of Right Ventricular Outflow Aneurysms or Akinesia and Adverse Right-to-left Ventricular Interaction