Julianne McLeod,Anuj Chavan,Harvey Lee,Sahar Sattari,Simrut Kurry,Miku Wake,Zia Janmohamed,Nicola Jane Hodges,Naznin Virji-Babul
Abstract:Complex motor skills can be acquired while observing a model without physical practice. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) also facilitates motor learning. However, the effectiveness of observational practice for bimanual coordination skills is debated. We compared the behavioural and brain causal connectivity patterns following three interventions: primary motor cortex stimulation (M1-tDCS), action-observation (AO) and a combined group (AO+M1-tDCS) when acquiring a bimanual, two-ball juggling skill. Thirty healthy young adults with no juggling experience were randomly assigned to either video observation of a skilled juggler, anodal M1-tDCS or video observation combined with M1-tDCS. Thirty trials of juggling were performed and scored after the intervention. Resting-state EEG data were collected before and after the intervention. Information flow rate was applied to EEG source data to measure causal connectivity. The two observation groups were more accurate than the tDCS alone group. In the AO condition, there was strong information exchange from (L) parietal to (R) parietal regions, strong bidirectional information exchange between (R) parietal and (R) occipital regions and an extensive network of activity that was (L) lateralized. The M1-tDCS condition was characterized by bilateral long-range connections with the strongest information exchange from the (R) occipital region to the (R) temporal and (L) occipital regions. AO+M1-tDCS induced strong bidirectional information exchange in occipital and temporal regions in both hemispheres. Uniquely, it was the only condition that was characterized by information exchange between the (R) frontal and central regions. This study provides new results about the distinct network dynamics of stimulating the brain for skill acquisition, providing insights for motor rehabilitation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the effects of different intervention methods on the acquisition of bilateral coordination skills. In particular, by observing action (Action Observation, AO), transcranial direct current stimulation (Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS) and the combination of the two (AO+M1 - tDCS), we can understand how these methods affect brain activity patterns and behavioral performance. Specifically, the study focused on the following points:
1. **Comparison of the effects of action observation and tDCS**: The study aims to compare the effects of using action observation alone, tDCS alone, and the combination of the two on the acquisition of bilateral coordination skills (such as juggling two balls), including changes in behavioral performance (such as juggling accuracy) and brain causal connection patterns.
2. **Differences in brain network dynamics**: By analyzing resting - state electroencephalogram (EEG) data, the study measures effective connectivity (Effective Connectivity, EC) under different intervention conditions to reveal the specific effects of different intervention methods on brain network dynamics. In particular, the study focuses on changes in the information flow rate (Information Flow Rate, IFR), which is a method for measuring the direction and intensity of information transfer between brain regions.
3. **Implications for motor rehabilitation**: Through the above analysis, the study hopes to provide new insights for motor rehabilitation, especially in how to use action observation and tDCS techniques to promote the learning of new movements or relearning after brain injury.
### Research background
- **Observational learning**: Observational learning refers to learning new motor skills by observing the actions of others without actually performing physical practice. This learning method is considered to involve complex brain networks, including the interaction between motor and non - motor areas.
- **tDCS**: tDCS is a non - invasive neuromodulation technique that changes the excitability of the cerebral cortex by applying a weak current through the scalp. Studies have shown that tDCS can improve the performance of various motor tasks.
- **Effective connectivity**: Effective connectivity is a method for measuring the influence of one brain region on another, which can identify causal, direction - dependent interactions between different brain regions.
### Research hypotheses
- **Action Observation (AO)**: It is expected that action observation will activate bilateral motor areas and form connections in the prefrontal - temporal - parietal action observation network.
- **tDCS**: It is expected that tDCS will mainly initiate information flow from the left primary motor area (M1) and form a two - way information exchange in extensive cortical connections.
- **Combination of action observation and tDCS (AO+M1 - tDCS)**: It is expected that the combined use of action observation and tDCS will form connections between the action observation network and the left primary motor area, and form a strong two - way information exchange in the bilateral occipital and temporal regions.
### Research design
- **Participants**: 30 healthy young people without juggling experience were randomly assigned to three intervention groups: the action observation group (AO), the primary motor cortex stimulation group (M1 - tDCS), and the combination group of action observation and primary motor cortex stimulation (AO+M1 - tDCS).
- **Interventions**: Each group respectively carried out 15 - minute video observation, tDCS stimulation or the combination of the two.
- **Evaluation methods**: The performance of the juggling task was evaluated by video recording and scoring, and the brain's causal connection patterns were recorded and analyzed by EEG.
### Main findings
- **Behavioral performance**: The performance of the action observation group was better than that of the tDCS group used alone.
- **Brain connection patterns**:
- **Action observation group (AO)**: It showed a strong information exchange from the left parietal lobe to the right parietal lobe, and a two - way information exchange between the right parietal lobe and the right occipital lobe.
- **tDCS group (M1 - tDCS)**: It showed bilateral long - distance connections, and the strongest information exchange occurred between the right occipital lobe and the right temporal lobe and the left occipital lobe.
- **Combination group (AO+M1 - tDCS)**: It showed a strong two - way information exchange in the bilateral occipital and temporal regions, and was the only group that showed an information exchange between the right prefrontal lobe and the central region.
### Conclusion
This study provides new insights into the brain network dynamics of different intervention methods on the acquisition of bilateral coordination skills, and provides potential application prospects for motor rehabilitation.