Uncovering gaps in women's authorship: A big data analysis in academic surgery

Camila Verônica S. Freire,Letícia Nunes Campos,Ayla Gerk Rangel,Abbie Naus,Sofia Wagemaker,Gabriela Rangel Brandão,Sofia Schmitt Schlindwein,Brenda Feres,Gabriel de Araújo Grisi,David P. Mooney,Júlia Loyola Ferreira,Roseanne Ferreira
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12256
IF: 3.282
2024-06-25
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Introduction Women are underrepresented in surgical authorship. Using big data analyses, we aimed to investigate women's representation as first and last authors in surgical publications worldwide and identify underlying predictors. Methods We retrieved eligible surgical journals using Scimago Journal & Country Rank 2021. We queried articles indexed in PubMed from selected journals published between January 2018 and April 2022. We used the EDirect tool to extract bibliometric data, including first and last authors' names, primary affiliation country, and publication year. Countries and dependent territories were classified following World Bank income levels and regions. Women's representation was predicted from forenames using the Gender‐API software. Citations were included if gender accuracy was ≥80%. Results We analyzed 210,853 citations containing both first and last authors' forenames, representing 158 countries and 14 territories. Women constituted 23.8% (50,161/210,853) of the first and 14.7% (31,069/210,853) of the last authors. High‐income economies had more women as first authors than other income categories (p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?