SPOP point mutations regulate substrate preference and affect its function

Yanran Deng,Wenhao Ding,Kaize Ma,Meixiao Zhan,Li Sun,Zizhang Zhou,Ligong Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06565-1
2024-02-27
Cell Death and Disease
Abstract:The adaptor SPOP recruits substrates to CUL3 E3 ligase for ubiquitination and degradation. Structurally, SPOP harbors a MATH domain for substrate recognition, and a BTB domain responsible for binding CUL3. Reported point mutations always occur in SPOP's MATH domain and are through to disrupt affinities of SPOP to substrates, thereby leading to tumorigenesis. In this study, we identify the tumor suppressor IRF2BP2 as a novel substrate of SPOP. SPOP enables to attenuate IRF2BP2-inhibited cell proliferation and metastasis in HCC cells. However, overexpression of wild-type SPOP alone suppresses HCC cell proliferation and metastasis. In addition, a HCC-derived mutant, SPOP-M35L, shows an increased affinity to IRF2BP2 in comparison with wild-type SPOP. SPOP-M35L promotes HCC cell proliferation and metastasis, suggesting that M35L mutation possibly reprograms SPOP from a tumor suppressor to an oncoprotein. Taken together, this study uncovers mutations in SPOP's MATH lead to distinct functional consequences in context-dependent manners, rather than simply disrupting its interactions with substrates, raising a noteworthy concern that we should be prudent to select SPOP as therapeutic target for cancers.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is how point mutations in SPOP (a type of POZ protein) affect its substrate selectivity and function. Specifically, the study found that SPOP interacts with the tumor suppressor IRF2BP2 through its N-terminal MATH domain and promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of IRF2BP2. However, different mutation forms (such as the prostate cancer-derived mutant SPOP-M35L) alter SPOP's affinity for IRF2BP2, thereby transforming it from a tumor suppressor to an oncogenic factor. Additionally, the paper reveals that SPOP mutations lead to different functional consequences in different cancer contexts, suggesting that careful selection is needed when targeting SPOP for cancer therapy.