Abstract:Compared with financial information, whether corporate social responsibility disclosure has impacts on debt financing cost has obviously become a heated topic in the academic. This paper selects A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets of China from 2013 to 2017 as sample to study the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost, including bond financing cost and bank loan cost. In addition, this paper divides the sample into voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure group and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure group and studies whether the effects of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost and bank loan cost are different. The empirical results are presented as follows: Firstly, enterprise disclosing high-quality corporate social responsibility report is more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost. Specifically, corporate social responsibility disclosure significantly lowers both the bond financing cost and bank loan cost. Moreover, the reduction impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost is greater than that of bank loan cost. Secondly, enterprises voluntarily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than that of enterprises mandatorily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports. Thirdly, non-state-owned enterprises are more conducive to reducing debt financing cost than that of state-owned enterprise. The enterprises with more market competition are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than the oligopolistic enterprises. Finally, this paper concludes and gives policy implications. This paper amplifies the literature regarding the economic consequences of corporate social responsibility disclosure and improves the understanding of the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost.

Open government data and the cost of debt

Corporate Hedging and the Cost of Debt

Open government data and resource allocation efficiency: evidence from China

Disclosure of Government Financial Information and the Cost of Local Government’s Debt Financing—empirical Evidence from Provincial Investment Bonds for Urban Construction

Understanding the Local Government Debt in China

Local Government Debt and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from China

Crowding in or crowding out? How local government debt influences corporate innovation for China

Can't Debt Come into Play Governance Effect Really?The New Evidence Based on the Listed Real Estate Companies in China

Corporate social responsibility and debt financing cost: evidence from China

Corporate Political Transparency and the Cost of Debt

The crowding out effect of government debt on corporate financing: Firm-level evidence from China

Can public data availability affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from China

Local government debt and corporate digital transformation: Evidence from China

Has local government debt crowded out enterprise innovation?

Air Pollution, Environmental Violation Risk, and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from China

Local Government Debt and Its Impact on Corporate Underinvestment and ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence from China

Does local government debt affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China

The Impact of Local Government Debt on Corporate Risk-taking

Social capital and cost of debt: Evidence from Chinese CEO network centrality

The impact of environmental information disclosure on the cost of debt: evidence from China

Local Government Debt Pressure and Corporate ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence from China