Association of green space with bone mineral density change and incident fracture in elderly Hong Kong Chinese: Mr. OS and Ms. OS study

Jiesheng Lin,Jason Leung,Blanche Yu,Jean Woo,Timothy Kwok,Kevin Ka-Lun Lau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111547
IF: 8.3
2021-10-01
Environmental Research
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>A large body of literature has reported positive effects of green space (GS) on various aspects of health and well-being, while no studies explore the role of GS in bone health.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objectives</h3><p>The present study aimed to investigate the associations of GS with bone mineral density (BMD) change and incident fracture in a prospective cohort of elderly Hong Kong Chinese.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Between 2001 and 2003, 3944 participants aged 65 years and older at baseline were recruited. GS (%) within 300-m and 500-m buffers were calculated for each participant based on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. BMD at whole body, lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck were assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 3 follow-ups. Incident fracture cases were ascertained from the electronic database of Hospital Authority of Hong Kong. Linear mixed-effects models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the associations of GS with changes in BMD and incident fracture, respectively.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Greater GS within 300-m and 500-m buffers were associated with a slower increase in lumbar spine BMD over 14 years. After adjustment for potential confounders, β and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of change in BMD across Q2-Q4 (quartiles of GS measured in a 300-m, compared with Q1) were −6.42 (−12.3, −0.59), −7.78 (−13.6, −1.97), and −7.83 (−13.7, −2.00) mg/cm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. GS was also positively associated with non-spinal fracture and major osteoporotic fracture incidence risks. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95%CIs) were 1.40 (1.09, 1.79; <em>P</em>-trend = 0.036) for non-spinal fracture and 1.53 (1.13, 2.07; <em>P</em>-trend = 0.010) for major osteoporotic fracture (Q4 compared with Q1 of GS measured in a 300-m buffer). Positive GS-fracture associations were also found for GS within a 500-m buffer.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>We found that those who lived near higher GS levels had a slower increase in lumbar spine BMD and had higher incident fracture risk.</p>
environmental sciences,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?