Four Dilemmas of Contemporary World Politics

R. Ragionieri

Abstract:For a long time the dilemma par excellence in international politics was the security dilemma, that was so labelled by J. Herz, but was already clearly individuated by Thomas Hobbes three centuries earlier. In much more recent times, two other dilemmas were analysed: the development and the environment dilemma (Senghaas 1994) Now, we can think that these two dilemmas (development and environment) conflated in a single one. The first dilemma had a proper meaning only in a situation where domestic politics could be sharply distinguished from international politics: in the first one there is a legitimate and a non-legitimate violence, whereas in the international arena all legitimate actors can use violence. In the contemporary political condition, the problem is not only about actors, that must defend their security, but also about the use itself of violence: when is violence legitimate. So, the security dilemma, we have to deal with the violence/non-violence dilemma. The second dilemma is between development and environment. This is more clear: for state and non-state actors, the choice is between actions that can damage the environment and actions and seem to have negative consequences on national and sometimes global economy. These two dilemmas bring to more general dilemmas (or we could say perhaps, meta-dilemmas). First, we have a legitimacy problem. What are the actors that are legitimate to decide (if there are any) about the use of violence, and who is entitled to

Political Science