(1012) Pain During Receptive Anal Sex: Is It A Novel Sexual Dysfunction?

Dr Massimo Giola
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae041.087
2024-06-15
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Objectives Anodyspareunia, or pain during receptive anal intercourse, has been introduced in the medical and sexological literature in 1998 by S. Rosser, but 25 years later it remains unacknowledged as a novel sexual dysfunction. Although pain during anal sex is not universal and in fact affects a minority of people engaging in receptive anal intercourse, it is reported by a significant proportion of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) and cisgender heterosexual women. It is imperative to re-consider the nature and role of anodyspareunia as a barrier to achieve full sexual satisfaction and as a cause of ill sexual health. Methods A systematic literature review from 1998 to 2023 was conducted, identifying 11 peer-reviewed papers (8 original studies and 3 previous reviews), plus 7 non-peer reviewed self-help books giving useful insights. Results The 8 original studies found a prevalence of anodyspareunia ranging from 5.5 to 14% of GBM, from 15.4 to 23% of GBM following treatment for prostate cancer; in the one and only study among women a prevalence of 8.7% was demonstrated. The risk factors for anodyspareunia in the literature can be grouped under three main categories, ie performance anxiety, sexual inexperience, and internalised homophobia. The self-help books propose some psychosexual techniques that warrant further investigations in clinical trials. The role of poppers, identified as a protective factor in some studies, remains to be defined, due to the lack of pharmaceutical grade preparations. Conclusions Anodyspareunia emerges from the available literature as a novel sexual dysfunction, and although several aspects need further research it apperas to fulfill the criteria and the definition accepted for all the other sexual dysfunctions. Advocacy work by scientific societies such as ESSM is needed to legitimise anodyspareunia and include it in future editions of standards and guidelines. Conflicts of Interest None.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?