Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy for patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Ting Jin,Qun Zhang,Qi-Feng Jin,Yong-Hong Hua,Xiao-Zhong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100989
IF: 4.803
2021-02-01
Translational Oncology
Abstract:We assessed 67 patients with R/M NPC treated with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy (<em>n</em> = 26) or anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor alone (<em>n</em> = 41).The incidence of HPD was higher in the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor group compared with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy group (39.0% vs 3.8%, <em>p</em>&lt;0.05).Adding chemotherapy to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor significantly improved 6-month PFS and OS for patients with R/M NPC progressing after first-line therapy.Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor alone or combined with chemotherapy are well-tolerated safety profiles.To compare the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor alone in recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) progressing after first or subsequent-line therapy.A total of 67 patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma from our hospital were included. All patients were sorted into two arms: anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm and anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm. We retrospectively estimated objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients of both arms. Chi-square test and Kaplan–Meier methodology were used to analyze.From September 2018 to March 2020, this research included 67 patients. For anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm, partial response and stable disease were observed in fourteen and 11 patients, respectively, for an ORR of 53.8%. For anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm, complete response and partial response were observed in one and 5 patients, respectively, for an ORR of 14.6%. The incidence of hyperprogressive disease was higher in the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor group compared with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy group (39.0% vs 3.8%, <em>p</em>&lt;0.05). Univariable analyses discovered that 6-month PFS and OS benefits were observed for anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor+ chemotherapy arm compared to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor arm (65.4% vs. 28.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.001; 100.0% vs. 73.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.014).In present study, we revealed that adding chemotherapy to anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor significantly improved 6-month PFS and OS for patients with R/M NPC progressing after first-line therapy. It warrants further study.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?