Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research

Mary A. Malina,Hanne S.O. Nørreklit,Frank H. Selto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111124702

2011-04-12

Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is first, to discuss the theoretical assumptions, qualities, problems and myopia of the dominating quantitative and qualitative approaches; second, to describe the methodological lessons that the authors learned while conducting a series of longitudinal studies on the use and usefulness of a specialized balanced scorecard; and third, to encourage researchers to actually use multiple methods and sources of data to address the very many accounting phenomena that are not fully understood. Design/methodology/approach This paper is an opinion piece based on the authors' experience conducting a series of longitudinal mixed method studies. Findings The authors suggest that in many studies, using a mixed method approach provides the best opportunity for addressing research questions. Originality/value This paper provides encouragement to those who may wish to bridge the authors' ideological gaps and to those who are actively trying to do so.

management,business, finance