Abstract:Background Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who develop cardiogenic shock (STEMI-SHOCK) face significantly increased risk compared to those without shock. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are commonly utilized in STEMI-SHOCK patients, but the benefits of MCS remain uncertain. This study aims to apply the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification system to STEMI-SHOCK patients, examining outcomes and identifying subgroups that may benefit from MCS. Purpose Our study assessed SHOCK severity in STEMI-SHOCK patients using the updated 2021 SCAI-SHOCK classification system and determined survival at various endpoints (30 days, 1 year, and 3 years), along with other outcomes such as vascular access complications and major adverse cardiac events, based on the severity class. Methods Patients with angiograms and indications of STEMI-SHOCK between 2012 and 2021 admitted to Liverpool Hospital Australia, were included after adjudication they had STEMI-SHOCK. Angiograms were eligible for adjudication if they met criteria for both STEMI and SHOCK. Each patient underwent individual adjudication by three researchers to confirm STEMI-SHOCK status. Patients were followed from the time of the first SHOCK diagnosis until censoring at the last follow-up. Data were retrieved from electronic and paper-based patient records. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and secondary outcomes were 1-year and 3-year survival. Results The SCAI stages of 160 (Estimated 220) STEMI-SHOCK patients were determined, with 17 in Stage A, 39 in Stage B, 53 in Stage C, 25 in Stage D, and 26 in Stage E. Worse SCAI stages were associated with significantly lower 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survival. No difference in survival between the time periods 2013-2015 and 2018-2021 was found. An eGFR < 60 millilitres/minute/1.73 meters^2 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 – 9.92, p=0.024) and lactate greater than 4.15 millimoles/liter (HR 6.48; 95% CI [2.84 – 51.64], p=0.001) at shock were associated with lower 30-day and 3-year survival. Patients in the SCAI C subgroup treated with an IABP had significantly higher 1-year (p=0.001) and 3-year (p=0.001) survival compared to those not treated with an IABP. Conclusion The SCAI classification system successfully predicted short and long-term survival in STEMI-CS patients, with worse stages having progressively worse outcomes. No improvement in survival outcomes was observed in the overall SCAI C-E group of patients treated with mechanical support. However, patients in the SCAI C subgroup of SHOCK treated with mechanical support showed a statistically significant improvement in survival outcomes compared to those treated without mechanical support. Further studies with adequate sample sizes are required to investigate sub-populations of SCAI classes that may benefit from MCS devices.

Shock index creatinine: a new predictor of mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients

Prognostic Value of Shock Index Creatinine in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Baseline shock index-creatinine clearance score and long-term mortality after ACS. Results from 24 years of follow-up of the ABC study on heart disease

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Cross-Sectional Study.

SHOCK INDEX-C: A NEWFOUND SPECTRUM OF SHOCK INDEX WITH GREAT ACCURACY TO PREDICT CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY IN PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION COHORT

Shock index-based risk indices as prognostic predictor for in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the results from Henan STEMI registry

Shock Index: A Simple and Effective Clinical Adjunct in Predicting 60-Day Mortality in Advanced Cancer Patients at the Emergency Department

Decoding cardiogenic shock: assessing shock index and its variants as prognostic indicators for in‐hospital mortality

Preoperative shock index in major abdominal emergency surgery

Predictors of One-Year Mortality at Hospital Discharge after Acute Coronary Syndromes: A New Risk Score from the EPICOR (Long-Term Follow Up of Antithrombotic Management Patterns in Acute CORonary Syndrome Patients) Study

Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Age shock index and age-modified shock index are valuable bedside prognostic tools for postdischarge mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients

A Risk Stratification Scheme for In-Hospital Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

The Value of Shock Index in Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Developed During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Age shock index as an early predictor of cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients

Prehospital Shock Index Multiplied by the Alert/Verbal/Painful/Unresponsive Score as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Traumatic Injury

Development and Validation of a Sepsis Mortality Risk Score for Sepsis-3 Patients in Intensive Care Unit

Early risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by severe cardiogenic shock - The ECLS-SHOCK Risk Score

Evaluation of a Risk Index for Predicting Short‐term and Long‐term Outcomes in Patients with ST‐elevation Myocardial Infarction

STEMI SHOCK outcomes with SCAI classification

A New Surgical Site Infection Risk Score: Infection Risk Index in Cardiac Surgery