Response to “Connectivity and pore accessibility in models of soil carbon cycling”

Bonnie G. Waring,Benjamin N. Sulman,Sasha Reed,A. Peyton Smith,Colin Averill,Courtney A. Creamer,Daniela F. Cusack,Steven J. Hall,Julie D. Jastrow,Andrea Jilling,Kenneth M. Kemner,Markus Kleber,Xiao‐Jun Allen Liu,Jennifer Pett‐Ridge,Marjorie Schulz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15850
IF: 11.6
2021-08-26
Global Change Biology
Abstract:We thank Baveye and colleagues (2021) for calling attention to the important role of soil structure in driving patterns of belowground carbon cycling – in fact, the rich literature on soil spatial heterogeneity directly inspired aspects of our PROMISE model framework (Waring et al. 2020). However, as we argue below, the key innovation of the PROMISE model does not lie solely in its acknowledgement of soil spatial structure. Rather, it hinges on the way PROMISE allows stochastic movement of particles throughout the soil pore space to decouple the chemical attributes of organic matter from its belowground residence time.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?