Abstract:Acoustic communication plays a prominent role in various ecological and evolutionary processes involving social interactions. The properties of acoustic signals are thought to be influenced not only by the interaction between signaller and receiver but also by the acoustic characteristics of the environment through which the signal is transmitted. This conjecture forms the core of the so-called "acoustic adaptation hypothesis" (AAH), which posits that vegetation structure affects frequency and temporal parameters of acoustic signals emitted by a signaller as a function of their acoustic degradation properties. Specifically, animals in densely vegetated 'closed habitats' are expected to produce longer acoustic signals with lower repetition rates and lower frequencies (minimum, mean, maximum, and peak) compared to the ones inhabiting less vegetated 'open habitats'. To date, this hypothesis has received mixed results, with the level of support depending on the taxonomic group and the methodology used. We conducted a systematic literature search of empirical studies testing for an effect of vegetation structure on acoustic signalling and assessed the generality of the AAH using a meta-analytic approach based on 371 effect sizes from 75 studies and 57 taxa encompassing birds, mammals and amphibians. Overall, our results do not provide consistent support for the AAH, neither in within-species comparisons (suggesting no overall phenotypically plastic response of acoustic signalling to vegetation structure) nor in among-species comparisons (suggesting no overall evolutionary response). However, when considering birds only, we found a weak support for the AAH in within-species comparisons, which was mainly driven by studies that measured frequency bandwidth, suggesting that this variable may exhibit a phenotypically plastic response to vegetation structure. For among-species comparisons in birds, we also found support for the AAH, but this effect was not significant after excluding comparative studies that did not account for phylogenetic non-independence. Collectively, our synthesis does not support a universal role of vegetation structure in the evolution of acoustic communication. We highlight the need for more empirical work on currently under-studied taxa such as amphibians, mammals, and insects. Furthermore, we propose a framework for future research on the AAH. We specifically advocate for a more detailed and quantitative characterization of habitats to identify frequencies with the highest detection probability and to determine if frequencies with greater detection distances are preferentially used. Finally, we stress that empirical tests of the AAH should focus on signals which are selected for increased transmission distance.

Rainforest birds avoid biotic signal masking only in cases of high acoustic saturation

Experimentally broadcast ocean surf and river noise alters birdsong

Multiple constraints on urban bird communication: both abiotic and biotic noise shape songs in cities

Auditory risk recognition is socially transmitted across territory borders in wild birds

Meta-analysis of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis reveals no support for the effect of vegetation structure on acoustic signalling across terrestrial vertebrates

Levels of Airborne Sound And Substrate-borne Vibration Calling Are Negatively Related Across Neotropical False-leaf Katydids

Patterns of Song across Natural and Anthropogenic Soundscapes Suggest That White-Crowned Sparrows Minimize Acoustic Masking and Maximize Signal Content

Noise constrains heterospecific eavesdropping more than conspecific reception of alarm calls

Potential social facilitation through song in bird communities

Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation

Migratory singers dynamically overlap the signal space of a breeding warbler community

Behavioral responses to predatory sounds predict sensitivity of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise within a soundscape of fear

Song amplitude variation in Masked Gnatcatcher (Polioptila dumicola) as response to traffic noise

Urban habitats and noise impact avian communities and shape vocal mimicry in a songbird

Tropical Forest Bird Counts and the Effect of Sound Attenuation

Global analysis of acoustic frequency characteristics in birds

Anthropogenic noise affects winter song structure of a long-distance migrant, Gambel’s white-crowned sparrow

Behavioral responses to predator and heterospecific alarm calls are habitat-specific in Eurasian tree sparrows

Effects of Valley Topography on Acoustic Communication in Birds: Why Do Birds Avoid Deep Valleys in Daqinggou Nature Reserve?

Living Together, Singing Together: Revealing Similar Patterns of Vocal Activity in Two Tropical Songbirds Applying BirdNET

Automatic Rain and Cicada Chorus Filtering of Bird Acoustic Data