Abstract:Objective:To study the clinical values and implications for the prognosis of procalcitonin (PCT) combined with C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in patients with bacterial bloodstream infection.Methods:One hundred and twenty patients with infection hospitalized from Mar. 2020 to Jun. 2021 were chosen as subjects. All participants were tested for serum PCT, hs-CRP, and blood culture. According to the types of pathogenic bacteria, they were divided into the gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infection group (n = 53) and the gram-positive bacteria bloodstream infection group (n = 31). Depending on the prognostic outcome of the participants after 28 days, they were categorized into survival and fatality cohorts. The PCT and hs-CRP levels were compared to explore diagnostic value implications for the prognosis of the cases with bacterial bloodstream infection.Results:Serum PCT and hs-CRP values in the positive cohort were higher than those in the negative cohort. The levels of serum PCT and hs-CRP in pulmonary infection were higher than those in the group with negative cases, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were 27 gram-positive participants and 9 gram-negative cases in the positive cohort. The serum PCT value of gram-negative bacterial infection was greater than that of gram-positive bacterial infection. The value of serum PCT in the gram-negative bacterial infection group was higher than that in the gram-positive bacterial infection group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of PCT, combination of hs-CRP and PCT, and hs-CRP were 0.946, 0.783, and 0.991, respectively. The combined examination of PCT and hs-CRP was the largest, PCT was the second, and hs-CRP was the lowest. These results indicated that the accuracy of combined detection of PCT and hs-CRP in the diagnostic bloodstream infection was the highest (0.991), followed by PCT (0.946) and the lowest (0.783). The PCT and hs-CRP levels of the survival cohort were lower than those in the death cohort. AUCs of PCT, hs-CRP and PCT, and hs-CRP were 0.848, 0.826, and 0.934, respectively. The combined examination of PCT and hs-CRP was the largest, followed by PCT and hs-CRP. The accuracy of the combination of PCT and hs-CRP was the highest (0.934), followed by PCT (0.848), and the diagnostic accuracy of hs-CRP was the lowest (0.826).Conclusion:There were significant differences in the levels of PCT and CRP between the gram-positive bacteria group and the gram-positive bacteria group. PCT and CRP have high diagnostic values in predicting the short-term prognosis of patients. PCT and CRP assist clinical diagnosis and guide treatment and play a positive role in early treatment and prognosis evaluation of patients.

Diagnostic value of Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for predicting patients with Bacteraemia in the intensive care unit

Value of CRP, PCT, and NLR in Prediction of Severity and Prognosis of Patients With Bloodstream Infections and Sepsis

Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin in Predicting Bacteremia in Intensive Care Unit

The ability of Procalcitonin, lactate, white blood cell count and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio to predict blood stream infection. Analysis of a large database

Predictive Value of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and Platelet Ratio in In-Hospital Mortality in Septic Patients.

Clinical Characteristics and Laboratory Biomarkers in ICU-admitted Septic Patients with and without Bacteremia

Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Significance of Procalcitonin Combined with C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Bacterial Bloodstream Infection.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin and Its Combination with Other Biomarkers for Candidemia in Critically Ill Patients

Combining PCT with CRP is better than separate testing for patients with bacteriuria in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study

Comparative Study of Plasma Endotoxin with Procalcitonin Levels in Diagnosis of Bacteremia in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Early Biomarker-Guided Prediction of Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Patients: C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Leukocytes

Prognostic value of neutrophil- lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) among adult ICU patients in comparison to APACHE II score and conventional inflammatory markers: a multi center retrospective cohort study

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio Better Predict Prognosis than Conventional Markers in Critical Patients? A Multiple-Centered Retrospective Cohort Study

Value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in diagnosis of bloodstream infection

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients Correlates with Unfavorable Clinical Outcomes

Predictive Value of Cytokines and Procalcitonin on Infection in Children with Hematological Malignancies

Infection markers as predictors of Bacteremia in an Intensive Care Unit: A prospective study

C-reactive protein and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission predicting bacteraemia with COVID-19

Infection biomarkers in assisting the judgement of blood stream infection and patient prognosis: a retrospective study incorporating principal components analysis

Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 for severity assessment of bacterial sepsis

Diagnostic and prognostic values of immunocyte ratios in patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit