Identifying time‐resolved features of nocturnal sleep characteristics of narcolepsy using machine learning

Marco Vilela,Brian Tracey,Dmitri Volfson,Lucie Barateau,Alice Cai,Derek L. Buhl,Yves Dauvilliers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14216
2024-04-28
Journal of Sleep Research
Abstract:Changes in sleep architecture on nocturnal polysomnography based on whole‐night and quarter‐night sleep metrics could distinguish narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) from clinical controls, narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). Optimal discriminating performance was achieved with a combination of different features across quarter‐night periods, with early rapid eye movement (REM) features ranked as highly important. Summary The differential diagnosis of narcolepsy type 1, a rare, chronic, central disorder of hypersomnolence, is challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other hypersomnolence disorders. While recent years have seen significant growth in our understanding of nocturnal polysomnography narcolepsy type 1 features, there remains a need for improving methods to differentiate narcolepsy type 1 nighttime sleep features from those of individuals without narcolepsy type 1. We aimed to develop a machine learning framework for identifying sleep features to discriminate narcolepsy type 1 from clinical controls, narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia. The population included polysomnography data from 350 drug‐free individuals (114 narcolepsy type 1, 90 narcolepsy type 2, 105 idiopathic hypersomnia, and 41 clinical controls) collected at the National Reference Centers for Narcolepsy in Montpelier, France. Several sets of nocturnal sleep features were explored, as well as the value of time‐resolving sleep architecture by analysing sleep per quarter‐night. Several patterns of nighttime sleep evolution emerged that differed between narcolepsy type 1, clinical controls, narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia, with increased nighttime instability observed in patients with narcolepsy type 1. Using machine learning models, we identified rapid eye movement sleep onset as the best single polysomnography feature to distinguish narcolepsy type 1 from controls, narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia. By combining multiple feature sets capturing different aspects of sleep across quarter‐night periods, we were able to further improve between‐group discrimination and could identify the most discriminative sleep features. Our results highlight salient polysomnography features and the relevance of assessing their time‐dependent changes during sleep that could aid diagnosis and measure the impact of novel therapeutics in future clinical trials.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?