Ming Scholars' Views of Narrative in Forest of Comments on Shiji

Zhou Jian-yu
Abstract:This article discusses the so-called Pingdian, the commentaries that consist of comments attached closely to and in accordance with the text of Shiji made by various scholars of the Ming period. It explores what these commentaries focus on, what narrative stances and viewpoints they present, what relationships may exist between them and the commentaries by Jin Sheng-tan, the father and son of Mao, and Zhang Zhu-po, as well as how to assess their value and significance in traditional Chinese criticism of narrative. This paper points out that the dual focuses on the techniques of essay and narrative applied in the comments in this book represent a transition from a concern with techniques of essay to that of narrative that was developed into more mature theories of narrative by Jin and Zhang. Its division of so-called orthodox genre and changed genre demonstrates critics' conscious concern with the nature of narrative genre. More importantly, by this division, the critics established a paradigm of traditional narrative. This is a significant contribution of Ming scholars. Because of these concerns and contributions, the significance of Shiji was intensified. This enriches our understanding of Shiji.
History,Sociology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?