Abstract:Despite strong evidence of important benefits of volume-targeted ventilation, many high-risk extremely preterm infants continue to receive traditional pressure-controlled ventilation in the United States and elesewhere. Reluctance to abandon one's comfort zone, lack of suitable equipment and a lack of understanding of the subtleties of volume-targeted ventilation appear to contribute to the relatively slow uptake of volume-targeted ventilation. This review will underscore the benefits of using tidal volume as the primary control variable, to improve clinicians' understanding of the way volume-targeted ventilation interacts with the awake, breathing infant and to provide information about evidence-based tidal volume targets in various circmstances. Focus on underlying lung pathophysiology, individualized ventilator settings and tidal volume targets are essential to successful use of this approach thereby improving important clinical outcomes. Two fundamentally different approaches to controlling gas flow during positive pressure ventilation are possible. In pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), sometimes also referred to as pressure-limited ventilation(PLV), the primary control variable is inflation pressure and the volume of gas entering the lungs (tidal volume,V T ) is the dependent variable that changes as the baby breathes more vigorously or lung mechanics change. The basic functionality of PCV devices is that of a T-piece resuscitator, providing a fixed inflation pressure with every breath regardless of the tidal volme delivered to the lungs. In volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), gas delivery into the ventilator circuit is the primary control variable and pressure becomes the dependent variable, changing as necessary to compensate for the baby breathing and to overcome resistive and elastic forces of the lungs. An innovative third option is volume-targeted ventilation that combines advantages of both modalities by automatically adjusting inflation pressure to maintain a target tidal volume, as will be described in detail later in this paper. Technological limitations of mechanical ventilation devices available in the early days of neonatal intensive care made it difficult to precisely regulate tidal volume delivery to the tiny lungs of newborn infants. Regulating inflation pressue was much easier and consequently pressure-controlled, time-cycled ventilation became the standard of care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In addition, the use of uncuffed endotracheal tubes with variable amounts of gas leakage around them meant that accurate tidal volume measurement was unavailable and clinicians had to rely on auscultation and visual assessment of chest rise to judge adequacy of ventilation. Despite these limitations, neonatologists became accustomed to this approach and many continue to employ pressure-controlled ventilation despite compelling evidence that volume-targeted ventilation reduces adverse consequences of mechanical ventilation. 1 The ability to control the inflation pressure and time, and tolerance of large leaks around uncuffed endotracheal tubes continue to be seen by some as the major advantages of PCV. The belief that inflation pressure is the main factor in lung injury (we refer to this as 'barophobia') has persisted to this day, despite clear evidence that pressure by itself does not injure the lung unless it results in excessively large tidal volume. 2

Volume-targeted ventilation vs pressure-controlled ventilation for very low birthweight infants: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Modalities of Mechanical Ventilation: Volume-Targeted Versus Pressure-Limited

Comparative Study of Pressure-Control Ventilation and Volume-Control Ventilation in Treating Traumatic Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Volume-Targeted Ventilation

Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed in infants and young children in the prone position: A prospective randomized study

Effect of different courses and durations of invasive mechanical ventilation on respiratory outcomes in very low birth weight infants

Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants

Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in newborn infants

Impact of different weaning strategies of high-frequency ventilation (HFV) on neonatal cerebral oxygen saturation and hemodynamics: protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

Single center experience with first-intention high-frequency jet vs. volume-targeted ventilation in extremely preterm neonates

Optimal Strategies of Mechanical Ventilation: Can We Avoid or Reduce Lung Injury?

Lung Protective Ventilation during Pregnancy: An Observational Cohort Study

[Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial]

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Applying evidence-based prevention bundle strategies of ventilator-associated pneumonia in ventilated neonates

Application of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Children with Acute Respiratory Failure

A follow-up of the survival and medical factors responsible for the termination of treatment in very or extremely low birth weight infants]

Effects of Different Ventilation Modes on One-Lung Ventilation: a Meta-analysis

Comparison of limited driving pressure ventilation and low tidal volume strategies in adults with acute respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial

A retrospective cohort study on mortality, morbidity, and care practices for 1750 very low birth weight infants, 2016–2021